2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00007478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in large-for-gestational-age infants of dichorionic twin pregnancies

Abstract: The aim of this study was to estimate standards of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants of twin pregnancies based on the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia. We examined 277 dichorionic twin infants (in 201 dichorionic twin pregnancies) who were delivered weighing > or = 2,500 g at 37-41 weeks of gestation. LGA in twin pregnancies was identified when the infant deviated > by 1.5SD from the mean gestational age of this study (LGA based on the twin pregnancy standard), or when the infant deviated by >1.5 SD of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypoglycemia can have deleterious effects on the well being of the neonates, especially, twins [14,15,16]. Although the proportion of hypoglycemic BWD preterm neonates in comparison to the term BWD hypoglycemic neonates was almost double, there was not sufficient evidence to contribute hypoglycemia in BWD neonates to prematurity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoglycemia can have deleterious effects on the well being of the neonates, especially, twins [14,15,16]. Although the proportion of hypoglycemic BWD preterm neonates in comparison to the term BWD hypoglycemic neonates was almost double, there was not sufficient evidence to contribute hypoglycemia in BWD neonates to prematurity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that neonatal hypoglycemia occurs more frequently in LGA infants than AGA infants (12). The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in LGA infants is reported as having a wide range (8.1-33%) (5,6,(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%