2008
DOI: 10.1253/circj.72.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Premature Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Therapy After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 These observations suggest that the antiplatelet effect of ticlopidine 200 mg/day was sufficient to prevent thrombotic events in Japan with lower side effect rate of ticlopidine. 22,23 A benefit of this study is the limited case selection bias because no other DESs were available during the study period in Japan. On the contrary, there were several Japanspecific risk factors such as small reference vessel diameter (the average was 2.47 mm), high percent of diabetics (43.3%) and off-label use (68.3%), including 11.2% total occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 These observations suggest that the antiplatelet effect of ticlopidine 200 mg/day was sufficient to prevent thrombotic events in Japan with lower side effect rate of ticlopidine. 22,23 A benefit of this study is the limited case selection bias because no other DESs were available during the study period in Japan. On the contrary, there were several Japanspecific risk factors such as small reference vessel diameter (the average was 2.47 mm), high percent of diabetics (43.3%) and off-label use (68.3%), including 11.2% total occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Previous studies report mechanical risk factors of stent thrombosis such as stent underexpansion and vessel dissection, 7,8 and this case report is of an unusual mechanism of stent thrombosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…[1][2][3][4] Previous clinical studies used relatively restrictive and non-uniform definitions of stent thrombosis 6,7 These definitions uniformly regarded evidence of any myocardial infarction with angiographic confirmation of in-stent thrombus or unexplained death within 30 days after the procedure as stent thrombosis, but varied when myocardial infarction was present without angiographic confirmation of target-vessel involvement. Thus, standardized definitions of stent thrombosis were required and were recently proposed by the newly formed Academic Research Consortium (ARC).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%