2013
DOI: 10.1177/1040638713477407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli strains in beef, pork, chicken, deer, boar, bison, and rabbit retail meat

Abstract: Abstract. The objective of the current study was to determine the incidence of contamination by the top 7 Shiga toxinproducing Escherichia coli (STEC) O-groups, responsible for the majority of E. coli infections in human beings, in retail meat from different animal species. Samples from ground beef (n = 51), ground pork (n = 16), ground chicken (n = 16), and game meat (deer, wild boar, bison, and rabbit; n = 55) were collected from retail vendors for the detection of 7 STEC O-groups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…STEC O157 has also been isolated from the carcass of slaughtered bison at a prevalence of 1.13% (77). Non-O157 STEC serotypes including O45, O103, O111, O113, O121, and O145 have also been isolated from bison carcasses; however, none of these isolates possessed stx genes (78).…”
Section: Bison (Bison Bison)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STEC O157 has also been isolated from the carcass of slaughtered bison at a prevalence of 1.13% (77). Non-O157 STEC serotypes including O45, O103, O111, O113, O121, and O145 have also been isolated from bison carcasses; however, none of these isolates possessed stx genes (78).…”
Section: Bison (Bison Bison)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E. coli isolated from mutton showed high incidence of virulence genes (21%) ( Table 2). Previous report has shown the incidence of pathogenic E. coli in beef, chicken, pork and other animal meats (Magwedere et al 2013). Isolates which showed presence of virulence genes were serotyped; 4 isolates belonged to O124, contained lt, aggR and eaeA genes, 2 isolates which showed presence of stx genes were categorized as E. coli rough strain and rest of the isolates were characterized as untypable E. coli (UT E. coli) (Table 2); however, isolates characterized as UT E. coli were positive for both the E. coli marker genes (flanking region of uspA and uidA) and positive for IMViC tests.…”
Section: Incidence Of Virulence Genes In the E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several 0111 serology suspects were found on the MacConkey agar plating, but none of these confirmed molecularly for the presence of virulence factors. This difficulty with detecting Olll is associated with isolates of this serotype not being able to grow to the same levels as the other Top 7 STEC in media containing antibiotic in the same amount of time (10). In addition, only one strain per O serogroup was tested in this study, so it is plausible that there may be differences (within the same '' USDA USDA ISO USDA" ISO USDArf USDA" ISO 102 250 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 10' 25 3 3 O verall, the three com m ercial detection m ethods (BioControl G D S, Q ualicon BA X , and Pall G eneDisc) displayed relatively the same level o f sensitivity for 0 2 6 , 0 4 5 (except Pall, w hich was not evaluated for this O serogroup), and 0 1 0 3 detection and show ed no difference w ith the m odified U SD A reference m ethod.…”
Section: R Esults a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%