1991
DOI: 10.1094/pd-75-1008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Soilborne Wheat Mosaic Virus and Its Reported Vector,Polymyxa graminis,in Field-Grown Soft Red Winter Wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
3
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is valid because naturally occurring isolates of other Polymyxa spp.-transmitted viruses such as BaYMV (Hariri et al 2003), Barley mild mosaic virus (BaMMV) (Kühne et al 2003), and Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) (Liu and Lewellen 2007;Varrelmann 2007), which are able to overcome host resistance, have been described. Several reports demonstrate that SBWMV could also be detected in leaves of a small proportion of individuals of resistant wheat cultivars either when inoculated with infested soils under glasshouse conditions or when grown in naturally infested fields (Armitage et al 1990;Driskel et al 2002;Himmel et al 1991). Similar observations were reported from wheat germplasm resistance screenings in SBCMV-infested fields in France, Germany, and Italy (Budge et al 2008) (U. Kastirr, personal communication).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis is valid because naturally occurring isolates of other Polymyxa spp.-transmitted viruses such as BaYMV (Hariri et al 2003), Barley mild mosaic virus (BaMMV) (Kühne et al 2003), and Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) (Liu and Lewellen 2007;Varrelmann 2007), which are able to overcome host resistance, have been described. Several reports demonstrate that SBWMV could also be detected in leaves of a small proportion of individuals of resistant wheat cultivars either when inoculated with infested soils under glasshouse conditions or when grown in naturally infested fields (Armitage et al 1990;Driskel et al 2002;Himmel et al 1991). Similar observations were reported from wheat germplasm resistance screenings in SBCMV-infested fields in France, Germany, and Italy (Budge et al 2008) (U. Kastirr, personal communication).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…A reduction or delay in viral accumulation in the roots or resistance to viruliferous P. graminis zoospores have been proposed as additional or alternative mechanisms of resistance to SBCMV or SBWMV in hexaploid bread wheat and in tetraploid durum wheat (Hariri et al 1987;Himmel et al 1991;Hunger et al 1989;Larsen et al 1985). Studies of other virus-plant interactions have shown that initial viral replication or movement is delayed or inhibited in resistant cultivars when compared with susceptible cultivars (Chain et al 2005;Kumari and Makkouk 2003) but it is not known whether such a phenomenon occurs in SBCMV-resistant wheat cultivars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBWMV has an etiology similar to OMV and OGSV. Both SBWMV and P. graminis have been detected in resistant plants (14). However, Himmel et al (14) detected higher levels of SBWMV in the roots of susceptible cultivars than in roots of resistant cultivars during the winter dormant period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SBWMV and P. graminis have been detected in resistant plants (14). However, Himmel et al (14) detected higher levels of SBWMV in the roots of susceptible cultivars than in roots of resistant cultivars during the winter dormant period. Himmel et al hypothesized that the higher level of virus in the roots of susceptible cultivars created a larger reservoir of virus which moves into the shoots in spring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os níveis mais altos de esporos de resistência foram encontrados nas cultivares suscetíveis e moderadamente resistentes, ao passo que um pequeno número de grupos de esporos de resistência foi observado na cultivar de trigo resistente. Esse resultado foi semelhante ao relatado por Himmel et al (1991) que observaram menor número de esporos de resistência nas cultivares resistentes do que nas cultivares suscetíveis. Nas cultivares IAC 5-Maringá e Embrapa 27 (suscetíveis ao SBWMV), o número de grupos de esporos de resistência foi reduzido na primeira época quando comparado à segunda época, embora o ID e a incidência tenham sido semelhantes nas duas épocas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified