Parasitological diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) by splenic smear is highly sensitive, but it is associated with the risk of severe hemorrhage. In this study, the diagnosis of VL using quantitative PCR (qPCR) in peripheral blood was evaluated in 100 patients with VL. Blood parasitemia ranged from 5 to 93,688 leishmania parasite genomes/ml of blood and positively correlated with splenic score (P < 0.0001; r 2 ؍ 0.58). Therefore, quantification of parasite genomes by qPCR can replace invasive procedures for diagnostic and prognostic evaluations.
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), also known as kala-azar, is a systemic protozoan disease that is caused by the parasite Leishmania donovani complex and is transmitted through the bite of an infected phlebotomine sand fly. VL is characterized by prolonged fever, splenomegaly, weight loss, and pancytopenia, and it is complicated by serious infection (1). These clinical features can easily be mistaken for other common febrile illnesses, such as malaria, enteric fever, tuberculosis, etc. If untreated, VL is fatal (2). There are an estimated 200,000 to 400,000 new cases of VL each year worldwide, and over 60% of these occur in the Northern Indian state of Bihar and the bordering regions of Nepal and Bangladesh (3). Therefore, it is necessary to use a diagnostic test that is highly sensitive and specific. At present, diagnosis is either confirmed parasitologically by the demonstration of amastigotes in bone marrow or spleen smears or by the demonstration of antibodies using the rapid immunochromatographic test, the direct agglutination test (DAT), or molecular tests (4-10). The sensitivity of amastigote detection in splenic smear is 96% to 98% (11, 12); however, splenic aspiration is associated with the risk of lifethreatening hemorrhage. Additionally, serological tests cannot discriminate between subclinical, current, and past infections (13,14). Various DNA-based molecular methods (PCR) have been used for the diagnosis of VL using blood, buccal swabs, or urine samples; however, their inability to discriminate between symptomatic or asymptomatic VL is a major drawback (7,15,16). Hence, more appropriate tools are urgently needed. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a promising tool that can be employed in the diagnosis of VL (17, 18). qPCR distinguishes symptomatic from asymptomatic VL and has the ability to diagnose VL early (19,20). We recently reported the usefulness of real-time PCR (RT-PCR) for estimation of parasite load during the treatment of VL (21). In the present study, we looked for a correlation between the splenic smear score (5) and the number of circulating parasites in patients with active VL.The study was carried out at the Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory (Department of Medicine, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India) and at its field site Kala-Azar Medical Research Centre (Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, and all subjects provided writt...