Background
As invasive mucormycosis (IM) numbers rise, clinicians suspect prior voriconazole worsens IM incidence and severity, and believe combination anti-fungal therapy improves IM survival.
Objectives
To compare the cumulative incidence (CI), severity and mortality of IM in eras immediately before and after the commercial availability of voriconazole.
Methods
All IM cases from 1995–2011 were analyzed across four risk-groups (hematologic/oncologic malignancy (H/O), stem cell transplantation (SCT), solid organ transplantation (SOT), and other), and two eras, E1, (1995–2003), and E2, (2004–2011).
Results
Of 101 IM cases, (79 proven, 22 probable): 30 were in E1 (3.3/year) and 71 in E2 (8.9/year). Between eras, the proportion with H/O or SCT rose from 47% to 73%, while “other” dropped from 33% to 11% (p=0.036). Between eras, the CI of IM did not significantly increase in SCT (p=0.27) or SOT (p=0.30), and patterns of anatomic location (p=0.122) and surgical debridement (p=0.200) were similar. Significantly more patients received amphotericin-echinocandin combination therapy in E2 (31% vs. 5%, p=. 01); however, 90-day survival did not improve (54% vs. 59%, p=0.67).
Conclusions
Since 2003, the rise of IM reflects increasing numbers at risk, not prior use of voriconazole. Frequent combination anti-fungal therapy has not improved survival.