1977
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1977.tb00050.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence Sampling: An Integrated Theory for “Matrix Sampling”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Email: m.rhemtulla@uva.nl A wide range of PM designs have been proposed, including designs for multi-trait multimethod research (Bunting, Adamson, & Mulhall, 2002;Saris et al, 2004;Revilla & Saris, 2013), longitudinal growth curves (Graham, Taylor, & Cumsille, 2001;McArdle & Woodcock, 1997;Mistler & Enders, 2012), cross-sectional survey research (Graham et al, 2006;Raghunathan & Grizzle, 1995;Thomas, Raghunathan, Schenker, Katzoff, & Johnson, 2006), case-control research (Wacholder, Carroll, Pee, & Gail, 1994), and educational assessment (e.g., "matrix sampling," Shoemaker, 1973;Sirotnik & Wellington, 1977). The multi-form PM design (variously referred to as the "partial questionnaire," "split questionnaire," or "split ballot" design) is one of the simplest and most versatile of these, where each participant is randomly assigned to receive only a subset of all variables (Arminger & Sobel, 1990;Graham et al, 2006;Raghunathan & Grizzle, 1995;Wacholder et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Email: m.rhemtulla@uva.nl A wide range of PM designs have been proposed, including designs for multi-trait multimethod research (Bunting, Adamson, & Mulhall, 2002;Saris et al, 2004;Revilla & Saris, 2013), longitudinal growth curves (Graham, Taylor, & Cumsille, 2001;McArdle & Woodcock, 1997;Mistler & Enders, 2012), cross-sectional survey research (Graham et al, 2006;Raghunathan & Grizzle, 1995;Thomas, Raghunathan, Schenker, Katzoff, & Johnson, 2006), case-control research (Wacholder, Carroll, Pee, & Gail, 1994), and educational assessment (e.g., "matrix sampling," Shoemaker, 1973;Sirotnik & Wellington, 1977). The multi-form PM design (variously referred to as the "partial questionnaire," "split questionnaire," or "split ballot" design) is one of the simplest and most versatile of these, where each participant is randomly assigned to receive only a subset of all variables (Arminger & Sobel, 1990;Graham et al, 2006;Raghunathan & Grizzle, 1995;Wacholder et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both groups, an overlapping multi-matrix sampling was used to distribute the items among different test booklets (cf. Sirotnik and Wellington 1977). This allows for two important features of the study design: First, items constructed from the same template did not appear next to each other, ensuring that participants were required to think about each item separately.…”
Section: Test Administration and Participant Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, variance components have been estimated in a variety of ways, such as through the use of multiple designs or G studies (Smith, 1981), the calculation of confidence intervals (e.g., Cronbach et al, 1972;Smith, 1982), or the posterior density function (Fyans, 1983), the use of confirmatory factor analysis (e.g., Figueredo, Cox & Rhine, 1995;Shavelson, Webb & Rowley, 1989), the analysis of covariance structure (Marcoulides, 1996), matrix (Brennan, 1992a), or linear mean square (Jarjoura & Brennan, 1982) procedures, or the theory of generalized symmetric means (Boodoo, 1982;Sirotnik & Wellington, 1977;Wellington, 1976).…”
Section: Estimated Variance Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%