OBJECTIVE -Type 1 diabetes has been associated with factors related to welfare and social class. During the past decade, Lithuania has experienced a transition period, leading to dramatic changes in the socioeconomic structure of the society.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Incidence in the group aged 0 -39 years by urban-rural setting (cities Ͼ100,000 inhabitants, towns, and rural areas), period (1991-1995 and 1996 -2000), age, and sex were studied using Poisson regression.RESULTS -The age-and sex-standardized incidence per 100,000 inhabitants per year was higher in men aged 0 -39 years than in women (9.5 and 6.9, respectively, incidence rate ratio [IRR] ϭ 1.39, P Ͻ 0.001). Incidence was lower in rural areas than in towns and cities (7.1, 9.0, and 8.8, respectively, P Ͻ 0.001). The urban-rural differences in incidence were most marked among children aged 0 -9 years. From 1991From -1995From to 1996From -2000, the overall incidence increased from 8.7 to 10.5 (IRR ϭ 1.22, P ϭ 0.001) in men and from 6.2 to 7.8 (IRR ϭ 1.25, P ϭ 0.002) in women. For men, the increase over time occurred predominantly in the cities, from 8.4 to 11.8 (IRR ϭ 1.40, P Ͻ 0.001), and in the older age-groups. In contrast, for women, the incidence increased more in small towns and rural areas, from 5.8 to 7.7 (IRR ϭ 1.33, P ϭ 0.003), and in the younger age-groups.CONCLUSIONS -The incidence of type 1 diabetes in Lithuania differs depending on the urban-rural setting, and the pattern of change over time differs between the sexes, both by urban-rural setting and age-group. The findings support the theory that lifestyle-related factors connected to socioeconomic status are important for the occurrence of type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care 26:671-676, 2003T he incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes varies greatly for different countries throughout the world (1) and in Europe (2), probably depending on different distribution of both genetic and environmental determinants across the populations. Significant variation of incidence exists also within the countries depending on the urban-rural setting, often expressed as population density, but the association is not consistent between the countries. In some countries, incidence is higher in more densely populated urban areas (3-5), while in others, it is higher in more sparsely populated rural areas (6 -8). These contradictory results for the effect of the population density point to other sociodemographic and environmental factors that may vary between urban and rural areas in different countries. Indeed, the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes is lower in areas where a larger proportion of the population is socioeconomically deprived (7,9); in Scotland, the incidence rates are particularly low in children living in deprived urban sectors (6). In Sweden, the incidence of childhood diabetes increased over time in parallel with per capita gross domestic product (10). An association between childhood diabetes incidence and indicators of national prosperity was also reported across European countries (11...