2002
DOI: 10.4067/s0365-28072002000100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INCIDENCIA DE PRUNUS NECROTIC RINGSPOT VIRUS (PNRSV), PRUNE DWARF VIRUS (PDV), TOMATO RINGSPOT VIRUS (ToRSV) Y PLUM POX VIRUS (PPV) EN VIVEROS DE FRUTALES DE CAROZO DE LA ZONA CENTRAL DE CHILE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to the data from other studies, the occurrence of PDV and PNRSV in different regions is highly variable, ranging from 0.4% to 17% for PDV (Domínguez et al, 1998;Jarrar et al, 2001;Herrera and Madariaga, 2002) and 6% to 46% for PNRSV (Domínguez et al, 1998;Jarrar et al 2001;Herrera and Madariaga, 2002;Myrta et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, according to the data from other studies, the occurrence of PDV and PNRSV in different regions is highly variable, ranging from 0.4% to 17% for PDV (Domínguez et al, 1998;Jarrar et al, 2001;Herrera and Madariaga, 2002) and 6% to 46% for PNRSV (Domínguez et al, 1998;Jarrar et al 2001;Herrera and Madariaga, 2002;Myrta et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After a negative result, there is only a 2% probability that the tree is infected by PDV. In epidemiological studies, the PDV incidence ranged from 0.4% to 17% (Jarrar et al 2001;Herrera and Madariaga 2002;Dominguez et al 1998). With these values, the maximum probability that a sample testing negative is infected is 0.41%.…”
Section: Fig 2 Post-test Probability Of An Individual Being Infectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to literature data, the PNRSV incidence is more variable. Usually, the incidence ranged between 5.6% to 10% (Myrta et al 2002;Herrera and Madariaga 2002;Dominguez et al 1998) while a peak of 46% has been observed (Jarrar et al 2001). A sample testing negative has therefore an infection probability of approximately 1% (low incidence) and 8% (high incidence).…”
Section: Fig 2 Post-test Probability Of An Individual Being Infectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PNRSV has been detected in many South American countries and in different host species. The prevalence of the virus in stone fruit trees in the central zone of Chile is 9.7% [28], while it reaches up to 25% in temperate zones in Argentina [14]. In Brazil, PNRSV has been detected in Rio Grande do Sul with a prevalence of 17% [16], while in Uruguay its prevalence is even higher, 48% [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%