2016
DOI: 10.33588/rn.6209.2015470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidencia y evitabilidad de los ictus hemorrágicos. Resultados del registro Ebrictus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study indicate a higher incidence of ICH in an emerging and vulnerable population subgroup, such as CCPs, than in both general and elderly populations. Data on time trends for ICH in the general population indicate no significant changes in the incidence of ICH over the last two decades [6,15], but the incidence density of ICH was 5to-60-fold higher than that observed in the general population, both within the study area and worldwide (Table 6) [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Comparisons between studies are difficult due to several interacting and overlapping emerging risk factors and aetiologies, new imaging techniques, demographic changes, comorbidities and associated treatments, different target populations, and the lack of a standardized methodology for data recording and exploitation, which makes it impossible to make adjustments to the incidences for different series of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study indicate a higher incidence of ICH in an emerging and vulnerable population subgroup, such as CCPs, than in both general and elderly populations. Data on time trends for ICH in the general population indicate no significant changes in the incidence of ICH over the last two decades [6,15], but the incidence density of ICH was 5to-60-fold higher than that observed in the general population, both within the study area and worldwide (Table 6) [6,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Comparisons between studies are difficult due to several interacting and overlapping emerging risk factors and aetiologies, new imaging techniques, demographic changes, comorbidities and associated treatments, different target populations, and the lack of a standardized methodology for data recording and exploitation, which makes it impossible to make adjustments to the incidences for different series of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite its low estimated discriminative power, a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 showed high sensitivity and a negative predictive value for the risk of ICH. This result is of special interest from a clinical point of view because it introduces the concept of "unnecessarily premature and avoidable mortality" for an episode of ICH as an indicator of the healthcare that these patients receive [18,37]. Further research related to the sensitivity and specificity of the HAS-BLED score for the identification of ICH risk in CCPs should be performed to detect the best cut-off point for not only detection but also strategy planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%