2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incident Apathy During the First Year After Stroke and Its Effect on Physical and Cognitive Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no relation between the apathy and PA levels in our study. On the other hand, similar to the literature, we found that nearly 40% of the patients were apathetic during this phase (40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We found no relation between the apathy and PA levels in our study. On the other hand, similar to the literature, we found that nearly 40% of the patients were apathetic during this phase (40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The few studies that provide longitudinal data of post-stroke apathy began assessment at least 1 month after stroke. Most found that apathy is rather stable over the 6–15 months post-stroke{3; 5; 7}, though one found that apathy lasts on average only for 6 months{8}.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symptoms of apathy frequently overlap with depression but apathy is a syndrome distinct from clinical depression (6). The adverse consequences of apathy that have been documented include decreased recovery following stroke (7), increased stress in dementia caregivers and greater disability in depressed individuals (2,8). In Alzheimer's disease, apathy is a significant predictor of cognitive and functional decline, depression and parkinsonism (4).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline PHQ-9 scores were also significantly different among the four conditions (Kruskall-Wallis H test, chi-square 8.29, df 3, P=0.04 ) with lower median depression scores at baseline (that approached statistical significance) in recovered compared with persistent apathy (2[2][3][4] vs 13[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], P=0.053). There were no differences in MMSE scores (Kruskall-Wallis H test, chi-square 6.63, df 3, P=0.09).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%