1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0036743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental and relevant learning with instructional objectives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When given instructions as to what material they are expected to learn, people will learn it more effectively by concentrating on the relevant material and paying less attention to irrelevant material. This effect has been shown empirically with many different types of materials and in many situations (Dawley & Dawley, 1974;Duchastel & Brown, 1974;Kaplan & Rothkopf, 1973;Marton & Sandquist, 1972;Mechanic, 1962;Meunier, Kestner, Meunier, & Ritz, 1974;Wolk, 1974;Wolk & Du Cette, 1974;Postman & Adams, 1957;Zerdy, 1971). If jurors knew what is relevant to their verdict at the beginning of a trial, they would be better able to focus in on relevant evidence as it is being presented, and later remember it.…”
Section: Time Of Presentationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…When given instructions as to what material they are expected to learn, people will learn it more effectively by concentrating on the relevant material and paying less attention to irrelevant material. This effect has been shown empirically with many different types of materials and in many situations (Dawley & Dawley, 1974;Duchastel & Brown, 1974;Kaplan & Rothkopf, 1973;Marton & Sandquist, 1972;Mechanic, 1962;Meunier, Kestner, Meunier, & Ritz, 1974;Wolk, 1974;Wolk & Du Cette, 1974;Postman & Adams, 1957;Zerdy, 1971). If jurors knew what is relevant to their verdict at the beginning of a trial, they would be better able to focus in on relevant evidence as it is being presented, and later remember it.…”
Section: Time Of Presentationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Examples of specific relevance instructions include reading to answer pre-reading questions or objectives (Duchastel & Brown, 1974;Duell, 1974;Frase & Kreitzberg, 1975;Gagne & Rothkopf, 1975;Kaplan, 1974;Kaplan & Rothkopf, 1974;McCrudden et al, 2005;Peeck, 1970;Reynolds, Trathen, Sawyer, & Shepard, 1993;Rothkopf & Billington, 1975a,b, 1979Rothkopf & Kaplan, 1972, 1978, use of inserted questions (Lapan & Reynolds, 1994;Lorch, Lorch, Gretter, & Horn, 1987a;Reynolds, 1992;Reynolds & Anderson, 1982;Reynolds, Standiford, & Anderson, 1979;Rickards & Di Vesta, 1974;Rothkopf & Billington, 1974;Shavelson, Berliner, Ravitch, & Loeding, 1974;Swenson & Kulhavy, 1974;van den Broek, Tzeng, Risden, Trabasso, & Basche, 2001), and answering explanatory "why" questions (van den Broek et al, 2001;Ozgungor & Guthrie, 2004;Seifert, 1993Seifert, , 1994Willoughby, Wood, Desmarais, Sims, & Kalra, 1997;Willoughby, Wood, & Khan, 1994). Pre-reading questions or objectives are examined prior to reading whereas inserted questions are interspersed throughout a text.…”
Section: Specific Relevance Instructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific objectives are often used to orient the learner to relevant material, while simultaneously reducing the likelihood of detracting attention from intended information (Duchastel & Brown, 1974). To the extent that intended learning of defined, specific lesson detail and information is required, specific statements such as those provided via objectives are often appropriate.…”
Section: Informing the Learner Of Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of objectives as orienting activities, Melton (1978) cited several studies where increased intended learning paired with decreased incidental learning were reported when behavioral objectives were presented prior to learning. (See also Duchastel, 1972;Morse & Tillman, 1972;Rothkopf & Kaplan, 1972, 1974 The implications of this research for the design of orienting activities is noteworthy. Activities should be designed that optimize the learning of both intended lesson content and the contextual knowledge that aids both encoding and retrieval.…”
Section: Intentional Versus Incidental Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%