2011
DOI: 10.2319/032210-165.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental findings arising with cone beam computed tomography imaging of the orthodontic patient

Abstract: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of orthodontic patients is a diagnostic tool used increasingly in hospital and primary care settings. It offers a high-diagnostic yield, short scanning times, and a lower radiation dose than conventional computed tomography. This article reports on four incidental findings-that appear unrelated to the scan's original purpose-arising in patients for whom CBCT was carried out for orthodontic purposes. It underlines the need for complete reporting of the data set. (Angle Ortho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a large sample provides a better clarification of the importance of reviewing CBCT scans thoroughly as significant diseases such as malignancies and also those diseases that are relatively rare are more likely to be included in the sample size, for example, the malignancy cases which were the most significant and immediately life threatening to the subjects. Our study also compares well with current published manuscripts by Pliska et al [8] and Rogers et al [9] and Pazera et al [10] which all looked at incidental findings on CBCTs made on orthodontic patients. The advantage of our study in comparison to the above studies is that there is a greater likelihood of finding diseases when a wider age group of patients was included.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such a large sample provides a better clarification of the importance of reviewing CBCT scans thoroughly as significant diseases such as malignancies and also those diseases that are relatively rare are more likely to be included in the sample size, for example, the malignancy cases which were the most significant and immediately life threatening to the subjects. Our study also compares well with current published manuscripts by Pliska et al [8] and Rogers et al [9] and Pazera et al [10] which all looked at incidental findings on CBCTs made on orthodontic patients. The advantage of our study in comparison to the above studies is that there is a greater likelihood of finding diseases when a wider age group of patients was included.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike traditional two-dimensional (2D) radiography, CBCT avoids structural superimposition and image enlargement and distortion, thus allowing precise three-dimensional (3D) visualization of dental and maxillofacial structures at a lower radiation dose than multislice computed tomography (CT) 1. Such imaging frequently presents the dentist or orthodontist with incidental findings and may raise concerns about the need for further diagnostic tests or referral to other specialists 2,3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu nedenle KIBT'nin dikkatli incelenmesi ve diğer uzmanlar ile konsültasyon önerilmektedir. 6,7 Maksiller sinüs problemleri daha önce yapılan çalışma-larda incelenmiş ve bu patolojilerin klinik bulgu vermeyebildiği rapor edilmiştir. Semptom göstermeyen sinüs problemlerinin %10,9 ile %69 arasında bir oran gösterdiği bildirilmiştir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified