2017
DOI: 10.1056/nejmc1710724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental Findings on Brain Imaging in the General Pediatric Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
3
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
68
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, when proceeding to the MR imaging of older children within the FinnBrain Birth cohort study, the correct handling of the incidental findings will be even more important, as incidental findings may include potential malignancies, etc. (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, when proceeding to the MR imaging of older children within the FinnBrain Birth cohort study, the correct handling of the incidental findings will be even more important, as incidental findings may include potential malignancies, etc. (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While visual inspection of images remains crucial, especially for the identification of incidental findings (Jansen et al, ), automated measures can provide important quantitative information. In fact, comparing an automated versus visual ratings with images that were manipulated, Gardner et al () found that visual raters were unable to detect slice thickness increases of 40%, whereas the automated approach was able to quantify even minor changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of the MRI acquisition, T 1 images were evaluated for incidental findings and rated for image quality using a six-point Likert scale (Jansen, van der Lugt, & White, 2017). The quality assessment levels for the scans were: unusable, poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent.…”
Section: Generation R Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,60 This is found in up to 0.9% of the general adult population and 0.6% of the general pediatric population. 28,65 One can further categorize patients with radiological tonsillar ectopia by anatomical findings at the foramen magnum, namely the presence or absence of "peg-like" or "pointed" tonsils and effacement of CSF spaces. 60 Lesions with these findings are more likely to be associated with symptomatic patients.…”
Section: Definition Of Cimmentioning
confidence: 99%