Incidental formation of episodic associations: The importance of sentential context

Abstract

The influence of relevant semantic context on the incidental formation of episodic associations between words was probed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we examined the influence of associations formed incidentally between unrelated words presented either in isolation or embedded in a sentential context on subsequent explicit paired-associate learning tested by cued recall. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the cued-recall rate of words studied in sentential context was higher than that of words co-occurring in isolated pairs. A subsequent single-items recognition test showed equal item memory for words studied in sentences than for words studied in isolated pairs, suggesting that the sentential context effect in cued recall indeed reflected stronger associations between paired words rather than better memory for single words. In Experiment 2, we ruled out memory for the entire sentence as an alternative explanation for the results of Experiment 1. We suggest two possible mechanisms to account for this advantage: First, pairs embedded in a sentence undergo semantic elaboration that might lead to the incidental formation of an association between them. Second, words embedded in a sentence enjoy the conjoint activation of compatible semantic features, a fact that may also facilitate the formation of an episodic association between them. The implications of these results for computational models using word representations based on co-occurrence data are discussed.

Sponsorship-Linked Marketing: Opening the Black Box

“…In particular, under conditions of an incongruent relationship between sponsor and event, articulation of the reasons for tbe sponsorship relationship resulted in improved recall for the relationship. These results are in accordance with recent research in psychology by Prior and Bentin (2003) that showed that incidental learning of the pairing of two unrelated nouns was better when they were linked in a meaningful sentence than when presented in isolation.…”

Why is the meaning of a sentence better remembered than its form? An fMRI study on the role of novelty‐encoding processes

“…Prior and Bentin (2003) found that pairs of words can be better remembered if embedded in sentences than if presented on their own at encoding; this facilitation effect of sentence context does not hold for memory for individual words. Furthermore, it seems to be specific to situations in which the sentence that includes the word pair is meaningful and can be fully integrated at the semantic level (Prior and Bentin, 2008).…”

Parallel interactive retrieval of item and associative information from event memory

“…Unitization refers to the creation of a novel entity that is "more than the sum of its parts", just as a word is more than a collection of letters or a painting more than a collection of brushstrokes, a topic often studied in Gestalt psychology (Wagemans et al, 2012a,b) as well as in the study of the perception of both simple and complex stimuli (Townsend & Wenger, 2015). The formation of unitized representations may be encouraged by semantic elaboration of either word pairs (Graf & Schacter, 1985;Prior & Bentin, 2003, 2008 or image pairs (Kan et al, 2011), resulting in the storage of stronger associative information. As in the present study, repetition of intact word pairs has been found to enhance memory for their association beyond any benefit from repeating the component items (Kilb & Naveh-Benjamin, 2011;Parks & Yonelinas, 2015), suggesting that associative information is a unitized representation of the complete pair that can be strengthened separately from representations of items.…”