1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9629(15)40224-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental Pituitary Macroadenoma: A Population-Based Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
1
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is due to the lower spatial resolution and partial-volume effect of PET, which is limited in the detection of pituitary microadenomas smaller than 10 mm. Two previous studies found the prevalence of macroadenoma to be 0.16%-0.20% (13,14). In the present study population, the estimated prevalence of macroadenoma was 0.24%, which is comparable to previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This difference is due to the lower spatial resolution and partial-volume effect of PET, which is limited in the detection of pituitary microadenomas smaller than 10 mm. Two previous studies found the prevalence of macroadenoma to be 0.16%-0.20% (13,14). In the present study population, the estimated prevalence of macroadenoma was 0.24%, which is comparable to previous reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In previously published studies, subclinically or incidentally detected macroadenomas were also very rare (3,7,26). Our statistical analysis did not reveal a clear significant correlation between clinical data and adenoma type.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…MRI studies in unselected populations report micro-incidentaloma rates of 10-38% (16,17). Similar to autopsy series the percentage of macroadenomas is quite low: 0.2% in CT series (18) and 0.16-0.3% in MRI studies (19,20). These data derived from normal populations or apparently asymptomatic patients are in contrast with the prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas, which is closer to 1 case per 1064-1200 (21,22).…”
Section: How Frequent Are Pituitary Incidentalomas?supporting
confidence: 60%