2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09071-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: prevalence, underdiagnosis and evaluation of an AI algorithm for automatic detection of pulmonary embolism

Abstract: Objectives To assess the prevalence of reported and unreported incidental pulmonary embolism (iPE) in patients with cancer, and to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for automatic detection of iPE. Methods Retrospective cohort study on patients with cancer with an elective CT study including the chest between 2018-07-01 and 2019-06-30. All study reports and images were reviewed to identify reported and unreported iPE and were processed by t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may likely be due to sub-segmental pulmonary embolus or due to non-optimized protocol for the pulmonary arteries as non-CT Pulmonary Angiogram (non-CTPA) studies were also processed by the algorithms; there may be flow artefacts or perivascular infiltrates rendering the image algorithms to struggle. 18 , 19 This was reflected by the 50% sensitivity at 98% specificity, for which there was a potential risk of over-diagnosis of false positives. Similar algorithms for chest CTPA 9 showed AI-assisted identification of incidental pulmonary embolism reduced the miss rate from 44.8% (without AI) to 2.6% which was remarkable compared to the static pulmonary embolism algorithm used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may likely be due to sub-segmental pulmonary embolus or due to non-optimized protocol for the pulmonary arteries as non-CT Pulmonary Angiogram (non-CTPA) studies were also processed by the algorithms; there may be flow artefacts or perivascular infiltrates rendering the image algorithms to struggle. 18 , 19 This was reflected by the 50% sensitivity at 98% specificity, for which there was a potential risk of over-diagnosis of false positives. Similar algorithms for chest CTPA 9 showed AI-assisted identification of incidental pulmonary embolism reduced the miss rate from 44.8% (without AI) to 2.6% which was remarkable compared to the static pulmonary embolism algorithm used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further use of bilateral Doppler ultrasound of the limb veins or CT venography of the deep leg veins is then needed to confirm or exclude DVT and to inform the pathway for subsequent treatment [ 26 , 27 ]. In addition, novel artificial intelligence algorithms, such as Aidoc, may become increasingly useful in assisting diagnosis due to their high specificity and sensitivity in the detection of incidental PE [ 28 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI has been introduced and put into practical use in the United States, primarily in radiological imaging [ 5 , 6 ]. This method utilizes deep learning, where the AI is trained based on supervised images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%