2021
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidentally Detected SARS‐COV‐2 Among Hospitalized Patients in Los Angeles County, August to October 2020

Abstract: We aimed to determine the percentage of COVID-19–associated hospitalizations reported to Los Angeles County (LAC) Public Health that might have been misclassified because of incidentally detected SARS-CoV-2. We retrospectively reviewed medical records from a randomly selected set of hospital discharges reported to LAC Public Health from August to October 2020 for a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 or a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result. Among the 13,813 discharges from 85 hospitals reported to LAC Public Health as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high frequency of incidental COVID-19 infection among hospitalized patients detected using the case definition based on lack of oxygen requirement exceeds the rates reported in previous studies that used more stringent case definition based on complete absence of COVID-19 symptoms (2) or were performed during periods of the pandemic prior to the Omicron variant surge (3). However, the high frequency of incidental COVID-19 is very similar to measurements based on case definition of severe COVID-19 (6) or correlates such as administration of steroid treatment (5) during the Omicron surge.…”
contrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high frequency of incidental COVID-19 infection among hospitalized patients detected using the case definition based on lack of oxygen requirement exceeds the rates reported in previous studies that used more stringent case definition based on complete absence of COVID-19 symptoms (2) or were performed during periods of the pandemic prior to the Omicron variant surge (3). However, the high frequency of incidental COVID-19 is very similar to measurements based on case definition of severe COVID-19 (6) or correlates such as administration of steroid treatment (5) during the Omicron surge.…”
contrasting
confidence: 58%
“…While preventing infection was the initial focus of the COVID-19 pandemic response, with increasing population immunity and variant transmissibility, the current focus has shifted to reducing hospitalization and deaths, particularly in vulnerable communities (1). During the recent surge in disease activity driven by the Omicron variant, an increased proportion of "COVID-19 hospitalizations" were incidentally discovered infections in patients newly hospitalized for other reasons (2)(3)(4)(5)(6), resulting in decreased measurements of in-hospital disease severity and mortality compared to prior disease surges (6-9). However, estimates of the proportion of total COVID-19 hospitalizations accounted for by these incidental infections range widely from 15% to 68% (2-6), due to heterogeneity in case definitions for these incidental infections and variability across populations with respect to vaccination status and other risk factors for severe COVID-19.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnant women were excluded from the analysis because previous studies reported that delivery is a common reason for hospital admission in patients with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infections. 12 See also Figure S1 . …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of hospitalizations classified as incidental COVID-19 varies. Prior to the Omicron variant surge, a report from Los Angeles County Public Health found that 12% of hospitalizations during August–October 2020 were classified as incidental COVID-19 [ 30 ]. In a cohort of fully vaccinated patients with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in Yale New Haven Health System, 46% of hospitalizations were classified as incidental COVID-19 [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%