1981
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1981.03320010049032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incisional Recurrence of a Cervical Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the patients had occult cervical cancer during pregnancy, so could not be correctly diagnosed until delivery. Except three cases of Stage III, and one case of Stage II, all of the other cases were Stage I cervical cancers (1,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) . The histologic type was SCC in ten patients including our case and cervical adenocarcinoma in four other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the patients had occult cervical cancer during pregnancy, so could not be correctly diagnosed until delivery. Except three cases of Stage III, and one case of Stage II, all of the other cases were Stage I cervical cancers (1,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) . The histologic type was SCC in ten patients including our case and cervical adenocarcinoma in four other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer reports have explored the prognostic implications for recurrence in an episiotomy scar in women with cervical cancer during pregnancy (5) . Implantation of tumor cells has been reported in abdominal incisions (21,22) and has led some to postulate the role of a dampened immune system during pregnancy on permitting these recurrences (12) . It may be important to make a distinction between tumor metastases and tumor implants since the latter may have a different biology and prognostic implications for locoregional and distant spread (21,22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantation of tumor cells has been reported in abdominal incisions (21,22) and has led some to postulate the role of a dampened immune system during pregnancy on permitting these recurrences (12) . It may be important to make a distinction between tumor metastases and tumor implants since the latter may have a different biology and prognostic implications for locoregional and distant spread (21,22) . It is hypothesized that the mechanism of these recurrences is related to mechanical rather than lymphatic spread as there is no evidence to date to support the notion that pregnancy accelerates tumor growth or spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third probable contributor to the development of metastases at sites of altered skin, tumor stroma, is demonstrated by Jones and Rous in their study. They show that connective tissue which is reacting to a mechanical insult grows profusely and rapidly when incubated in plasma 15–16 . One can speculate that a very active connective (granulation) tissue which can more readily proliferate and support the growth of tumor cells may enhance the establishment of metastasis in injured tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%