2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incivility hates company: Shared incivility attenuates rumination, stress, and psychological withdrawal by reducing self-blame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
112
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results provide support for the allegation that self‐blame can potentially allow targets to perceive self‐responsibility for improving their predicament (Janoff‐Bulman, ), and when coupled with high emotional control can galvanize employees into reacting in a prosocial manner toward their coworkers. Importantly, our findings extend prior research that has generally portrayed targets of workplace incivility as passive recipients of mistreatment who eventually succumb to emotional distress (Schilpzand, Leavitt, & Lim, ) or engage in withdrawal behavior or hostile responses such as retaliating or behaving in an uncivil manner to innocent others (Foulk et al, ; Gallus et al, ; Rosen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results provide support for the allegation that self‐blame can potentially allow targets to perceive self‐responsibility for improving their predicament (Janoff‐Bulman, ), and when coupled with high emotional control can galvanize employees into reacting in a prosocial manner toward their coworkers. Importantly, our findings extend prior research that has generally portrayed targets of workplace incivility as passive recipients of mistreatment who eventually succumb to emotional distress (Schilpzand, Leavitt, & Lim, ) or engage in withdrawal behavior or hostile responses such as retaliating or behaving in an uncivil manner to innocent others (Foulk et al, ; Gallus et al, ; Rosen et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…By drawing from the social cognitive theory of self‐regulation (Bandura, ), we managed to pinpoint targets' belief in their capability, represented by trait emotional control, as a potential moderator for qualifying the positive relation of self‐blame with subsequent supportive behaviors. This demonstrates trait emotional control as a capacity for reining in the detrimental emotions typically associated with self‐blame that may otherwise lead to emotional exhaustion or antisocial responses (Schilpzand, Leavitt, & Lim, ; Zhou, Yan, Che, & Meier, ), thus offering insights into the long‐time puzzle of when self‐blame can have motivational properties and be related to better coping (i.e., less emotional exhaustion) and, unconventionally, a prosocial reaction (i.e., exhibiting supportive behaviors). These results provide support for the allegation that self‐blame can potentially allow targets to perceive self‐responsibility for improving their predicament (Janoff‐Bulman, ), and when coupled with high emotional control can galvanize employees into reacting in a prosocial manner toward their coworkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations