2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclined jets inside a common envelope of a triple stellar system

Abstract: We conduct a three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulation to study the interaction of two opposite inclined jets inside the envelope of a giant star, and find that the jets induce many vortexes inside the envelope and that they efficiently remove mass from the envelope and form a very clumpy outflow. We assume that this very rare type of interaction occurs when a tight binary system enters the envelope of a giant star, and that the orbital plane of the tight binary system and that of the triple stellar system a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case of an AGB star that engulfs a tight binary system of two MSSs or of a white dwarf with a MSS is relevant to the formation of planetary nebulae, and in particular to planetary nebulae with 'messy' morphologies, i.e, that lack any kind of symmetry. 'Messy' planetary nebulae most like result from triple star interaction (e.g., Bear & Soker 2017;Danehkar et al 2018;Jones et al 2019;Miszalski et al 2019;Schreier et al 2019;Rechy-García et al 2020;Henney et al 2021). The spinning-up of the AGB envelope to have a rotation that is inclined to the triple star orbital angular momentum that I studied here adds to the 'messy' mass loss morphology.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case of an AGB star that engulfs a tight binary system of two MSSs or of a white dwarf with a MSS is relevant to the formation of planetary nebulae, and in particular to planetary nebulae with 'messy' morphologies, i.e, that lack any kind of symmetry. 'Messy' planetary nebulae most like result from triple star interaction (e.g., Bear & Soker 2017;Danehkar et al 2018;Jones et al 2019;Miszalski et al 2019;Schreier et al 2019;Rechy-García et al 2020;Henney et al 2021). The spinning-up of the AGB envelope to have a rotation that is inclined to the triple star orbital angular momentum that I studied here adds to the 'messy' mass loss morphology.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The large fraction of triple and higher order star systems among massive stars (e.g., Sana et al 2014;Moe & Di Stefano 2017) and the rich triple star interaction outcomes (e.g., Toonen et al 2021) have motivated studies of CEJSNe in triple stars systems (e.g., Soker 2021a,b; Akashi & Soker 2021) as well as other triple-star CEE (e.g., Sabach & Soker 2015;Hillel et al 2017;Schreier et al 2019;Comerford & Izzard 2020;Glanz & Perets 2021;Soker & Bear 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when the spin direction of the sBH is misaligned with respect to the angular momentum direction of the AGN disk (e.g. Schreier et al 2019, for the inclined JFM in common envelope evolution), it takes a longer time for the jet-cocoon to break out. Then, the depletion region by the cocoon is effectively enhanced to r dep = f ext H AGN θ c /cosi, where i is the inclination angle of the jet with respect to the orbital angular momentum of the AGN disk.…”
Section: C2 Inclined Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These omissions allow us to follow the system for years, unlike simulations that include the accretion process onto the NS/BH and are therefore limited to evolution time of several days or less (e.g., Moreno Méndez et al 2017;López-Cámara et al 2019. To reach our goal we set the numerical scheme in a similar manner to earlier studies of jet-induced outflow in CEE (e.g., Shiber & Soker 2018;Schreier et al 2019, but in the present study we include jets from a NS rather than from a main sequence star. We follow the flow structure in sections 4 and in section 5 we study the negative feedback process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%