2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Including stakeholder input in formulating and solving real-world optimisation problems: Generic framework and case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach ought to satisfy the requirements of a water utility and other stakeholders for objectives, constraints, decision variables, as well as model assumptions. Although studies exist that report on successful solutions to such problems [100,127,[197][198][199], they are limited possibly due to the complexity associated with mathematically formulating objectives and constraints and/or finding the best solution. Study [200] even speculates that the real-world considerations need to be explicitly quantified, "if it is possible to do so at all", otherwise the water industry will apply engineering judgment instead of any optimisation method to design WDSs.…”
Section: Test Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach ought to satisfy the requirements of a water utility and other stakeholders for objectives, constraints, decision variables, as well as model assumptions. Although studies exist that report on successful solutions to such problems [100,127,[197][198][199], they are limited possibly due to the complexity associated with mathematically formulating objectives and constraints and/or finding the best solution. Study [200] even speculates that the real-world considerations need to be explicitly quantified, "if it is possible to do so at all", otherwise the water industry will apply engineering judgment instead of any optimisation method to design WDSs.…”
Section: Test Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous applications of MOEAs in water resources have emerged in recent years (Ahmadi et al, ; Giuliani et al, ; Giuliani, Anghileri, et al, ; Herman et al, ; Kasprzyk et al, ; Mortazavi‐Naeini et al, ; Smith et al, ; Watson & Kasprzyk, ; W. Wu et al, ), several of which demonstrate the conflicting objectives of competing stakeholders. Maier et al () argue that the primary focus of MOEA research has been on improving the algorithms and note the lack of applications to real‐world problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maier et al () argue that the primary focus of MOEA research has been on improving the algorithms and note the lack of applications to real‐world problems. While applications to address the needs of multiple stakeholders in a river system are increasingly common (Herman et al, ; W. Wu et al, ), to date there have been few that address the challenges of transboundary rivers. Giuliani, Anghileri, et al () apply the Borg MOEA (Hadka & Reed, ) to the Red River Basin, including parts of China, Laos, and Vietnam, to assess trade‐offs between hydropower, water supply, and flood damages under current and future hydrologic projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the successful application of simulation-optimization techniques for solving real-world management problems remains a challenge due to a common lack of interaction between scientists and decision makers [70]. To overcome this challenge and link optimization applications more closely to real-world management problems, Wu et al [71] recently proposed a framework for including stakeholder input at various stages in the optimization process. In this context, integrating model outputs into meta-model-type learning environments can help to visualise cross-benefits between management measures and facilitate communication and social learning in participatory planning.…”
Section: The Value Of Model-based Information For Adaptation Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%