Action Research in a Relational Perspective 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429289408-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion and exclusion in action research on person-centered health care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the action research process, we paid reflexive attention to the tensions in dynamics of inclusion and exclusion both in the counseling conversations and in the action research process itself. In this article, we focus on the former; for an analysis of the latter, see Phillips and Scheffmann-Petersen (2019). In relation to analyses both of the counseling conversations and of the action research process, it is important to recognize as an inexorable limitation of reflexivity that the critique of power relations produced through reflexivity is circumscribed since it is itself discursively constructed from a particular perspective and imbued with power, entailing the exclusion of other perspectives.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the action research process, we paid reflexive attention to the tensions in dynamics of inclusion and exclusion both in the counseling conversations and in the action research process itself. In this article, we focus on the former; for an analysis of the latter, see Phillips and Scheffmann-Petersen (2019). In relation to analyses both of the counseling conversations and of the action research process, it is important to recognize as an inexorable limitation of reflexivity that the critique of power relations produced through reflexivity is circumscribed since it is itself discursively constructed from a particular perspective and imbued with power, entailing the exclusion of other perspectives.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it represented a distinctive kind of action research by virtue of IFADIA's social constructionist, Bakhtinian understanding of voice as an unstable product of situated meaning-making (rather than a manifestation of a human inner core), and its post-structuralist commitment to the critical interrogation and destabilization of taken-for-granted truths as the products of discourses. These two features underpin the integration into IFADIA-informed action research of reflexive analyses of the tensional, power-imbued, negotiation of knowledge, and identities across voices (Phillips & Scheffmann-Petersen, 2019).…”
Section: The Aps Program and The Action Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design included a series of four all-day workshops in which we (the coauthors of this article) and the nurses carried out joint analyses of six counselling conversations that we, the university researchers, had selected from the fifty conversations they had recorded. This article presents our own analyses which we have carried out following the workshops (see Phillips and Scheffmann-Petersen [2019] for an account of the use of IFADIA to design the action research project and cultivate reflexivity about the tensions in counselling conversations and the action research process itself). The extracts that are analysed in this article emanate from two of the six conversations that were the object of joint analyses.…”
Section: Empirical Material Analytical Focus and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the action research project attached to the APS programme, we have worked to cultivate that reflexivity through joint analyses with the counselling team of nurses of extracts from counselling conversations including the ones analysed in this article (see Phillips and Scheffmann‐Petersen 2019, 2020). One of the methods used was the ‘forum play’ in which nurses did not just talk about practice but repeatedly acted out different ways of tackling the tension between self‐discipline and empowerment in a specific conversational situation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Perspectives On Inclusion And Exclusimentioning
confidence: 99%