2000
DOI: 10.1080/088562500361619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion in Norway: a study of ideology in practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
10

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
32
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In many countries, this resulted in changing education policies and in making regular education the standard provision for all students, including those with special educational needs. One of the core ideas behind these changes is that both children with and without disabilities experience social benefits in regular schools (Flem and Keller 2000), like acceptance of children with disabilities in society (Tafa and Manolitsis 2003) and friendships (Scheepstra et al 1999). Although more acceptance and friendships for students with disabilities in regular schools are a widely supported aim, implementing inclusion in daily practice is challenging (Ferguson 2008;Vislie 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries, this resulted in changing education policies and in making regular education the standard provision for all students, including those with special educational needs. One of the core ideas behind these changes is that both children with and without disabilities experience social benefits in regular schools (Flem and Keller 2000), like acceptance of children with disabilities in society (Tafa and Manolitsis 2003) and friendships (Scheepstra et al 1999). Although more acceptance and friendships for students with disabilities in regular schools are a widely supported aim, implementing inclusion in daily practice is challenging (Ferguson 2008;Vislie 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the plethora of literature documented that, diverse special educational needs (SENs) learners actually benefit socially and academically when they attend regular school with typically developing children (Nakken & Pijl 2002, Flem & Keller, 2000, Vislie, 2003. Previously, this was thought to be unrealistic and impracticable for learners with SENs to get an education in the same class with learners without SENs (Pijl, Nakken, & Mand, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the students attended regular classes. Because of the emphasis in Norway on inclusive education (Flem & Keller, 2000), and the fact that only 0.7 % of children are not attending regular schools (Flem, 1998), the variation in achievement level within our sample was still substantial. This was also reflected in the PISA literacy test scores of the subsample, showing the same variation in reading performance as the large Norwegian PISA sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%