2020
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.305882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion of Disability Content in Graduate Public Health Curricula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We again underscore the importance of theory-informed inquiry. To surface and disrupt these more insidious ways that ableism informs the research process, training and research institutions must commit to policies and practices that deepen engagement with critical scholarship that challenges traditional and often unarticulated assumptions about disability ( 93 , 94 ). The value of this engagement is illustrated by articles in this review, like Whittle and colleagues ( 79 ), whose theoretical grounding allowed the authors to discuss issues of competency training of social services providers as one path to stigma prevention and address how stigma gets perpetuated and reproduced through the structural operation of benefits provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We again underscore the importance of theory-informed inquiry. To surface and disrupt these more insidious ways that ableism informs the research process, training and research institutions must commit to policies and practices that deepen engagement with critical scholarship that challenges traditional and often unarticulated assumptions about disability ( 93 , 94 ). The value of this engagement is illustrated by articles in this review, like Whittle and colleagues ( 79 ), whose theoretical grounding allowed the authors to discuss issues of competency training of social services providers as one path to stigma prevention and address how stigma gets perpetuated and reproduced through the structural operation of benefits provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%