2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion of walnut in the diets of adults at risk for type 2 diabetes and their dietary pattern changes: a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial

Abstract: BackgroundIn our recently published study, including walnuts in the diets of adults with prediabetes led to overall improvement in diet quality. This report adds to those study findings by examining the food groups displaced during walnut inclusion in the diets of those adults with prediabetes.MethodsRandomized, controlled, modified Latin square parallel design with 2 treatment arms. The 112 participants (31 men, 81 women) were randomly assigned to a diet with or without dietary counseling to regulate calorie … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Change in dietary intake and food choices in free-living individuals in response to prescribing other nuts (walnuts, almonds, and hazelnuts) has been examined in a few previous studies [ 19 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. In most of these studies, displacement of other foods generally improved nutritional quality of the diet and may also explain why the addition of nuts to the diet does not promote weight gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in dietary intake and food choices in free-living individuals in response to prescribing other nuts (walnuts, almonds, and hazelnuts) has been examined in a few previous studies [ 19 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. In most of these studies, displacement of other foods generally improved nutritional quality of the diet and may also explain why the addition of nuts to the diet does not promote weight gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were published between 2004 and 2017. Nine publications were reported from American countries (11,12,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) , two from South Africa (21,22) and the other one from China (23) . Age of participants was between 20 and 75 years.…”
Section: Findings Of Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the remaining fourteen articles, five articles reported on subjects at high risk of developing T2D (25)(26)(27)(28)(29) and nine articles reported on subjects with prediabetes (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38) . Six articles were excluded for the following reasons; one article (27) did not include criteria for defining prediabetes; one article (29) assessed only diet quality and food group consumption; in one article (26) which defined prediabetes as 2-h PG during OGTT of 140-199 mg/dl (7•8-11•0 mmol/l), the mean baseline value of 2-h PG was lower than the bottom cut-off point for defining IGT-prediabetes; one article (25) aimed to investigate the first-meal (0-240 min) and second-meal (240-490 min) effects of nut consumption; one article (37) was excluded because it did not report intervention studies with nuts or seeds, but rather tested ad libitum diets with different glycaemic load or a high-fat/low-carbohydrate hypoenergetic diet; finally, one article (30) was excluded because it did not meet the eligibility criteria with respect to the control; ground flaxseed was tested against equal amount of ground wheat bran. In other words, that study was aimed to determine the effects of flaxseed over the effects of wheat bran, instead of a flaxseed-free diet in general.…”
Section: Search and Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%