2005
DOI: 10.1075/tsl.63.16nev
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive and exclusive in Turkic languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Dolgan, there are two instances of dual marking in the first person, but not in the second person and neither with items lower on the animacy hierarchy. Within the Turkic language family, this pattern is exceptional; seemingly parallel patterns in Sakha (Yakut) and South Siberian languages are rather instances of inclusive vs. exclusive first person (see Nevskaya 2005). In Chulym Turkic, both free and bound person markers are irregularly formed in the first person (e.g.…”
Section: Number and Animacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Dolgan, there are two instances of dual marking in the first person, but not in the second person and neither with items lower on the animacy hierarchy. Within the Turkic language family, this pattern is exceptional; seemingly parallel patterns in Sakha (Yakut) and South Siberian languages are rather instances of inclusive vs. exclusive first person (see Nevskaya 2005). In Chulym Turkic, both free and bound person markers are irregularly formed in the first person (e.g.…”
Section: Number and Animacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is independent evidence that [±minimal] occurs in the Turkic language family (cf. Nevskaya 2005), but search for independent evidence in Turkish in particular is still ongoing.…”
Section: Martí's (2020a) Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%