2011
DOI: 10.1080/13603110903030105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive education and theNo Child Left BehindAct: resisting entrenchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The demands of working with other agencies and issues relating to decision-making and the roles of parents, students, and other professionals is also challenging for regular education teachers (Mowat, 2010). The uncertainty and time-consuming nature of identifying different approaches when providing support, the place of alternative settings and services for the inclusion of students with special needs have also received criticism from some educators (Hulgin & Drake, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demands of working with other agencies and issues relating to decision-making and the roles of parents, students, and other professionals is also challenging for regular education teachers (Mowat, 2010). The uncertainty and time-consuming nature of identifying different approaches when providing support, the place of alternative settings and services for the inclusion of students with special needs have also received criticism from some educators (Hulgin & Drake, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For teaching inclusive classes to be effective, special and regular teachers should be enriched with skills for different types of disabilities, including attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders, which are among the most difficult to address. It is important to know clearly whether teachers in inclusive secondary schools manage to address these kinds of disabilities and meet the objectives planned for each student [43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hattie (2017) notes that the effect size for peer tutoring is 0.53, and for the JIGSAW approach was 1.2. As well as fitting Hattie’s criteria, they are also largely theoretically rooted in the social constructivism which is often associated with effective inclusion of children with SEN in the classroom (Cook and Odom, 2013; Ertmer and Newby, 2013; Hulgin and Drake, 2011; Lenjani, 2016). As noted, of equal importance was the fact that these strategies were also a part of the revised curriculum for student special education teachers in Kuwait.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%