2014
DOI: 10.1080/09766634.2014.11885634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive Education: Are We There? Some Global Challenges, Contradictions and Anomalies

Abstract: Since the signing of the Salamanca statement in 1994, various countries have vowed to implement inclusive education. Different version of inclusion have been adopted worldwide but critics are beginning to suspect that, while inclusion sounds good in theory, it has not yet translated into implementable and realisable ideals. The study on which this analytical paper is based therefore explored challenges, contradictions and anomalies in the implementation of inclusive education globally. Various articles by lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This call coincided with results-oriented accountability systems that have also been widely accepted by most countries globally [2]. Although there are variations in the way inclusive education is understood within and across nations [3], its common ideal elements, as also embraced in the present study, involve the right to education for all, giving prominence to the notion of equality, and a curriculum that is responsive to the needs of all learners [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This call coincided with results-oriented accountability systems that have also been widely accepted by most countries globally [2]. Although there are variations in the way inclusive education is understood within and across nations [3], its common ideal elements, as also embraced in the present study, involve the right to education for all, giving prominence to the notion of equality, and a curriculum that is responsive to the needs of all learners [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%