1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.55.1843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive(p,3He) reactions on59Co and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a general feature of multistep calculations, as was also found in our previous work [8][9][10][11]15]. Although the actual step which is dominant at a specific emission energy only influences the shape of the cross section relatively slightly, an appreciable contribution of higher steps affects the analyzing power distribution profoundly.…”
Section: B Analyzing Power Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is a general feature of multistep calculations, as was also found in our previous work [8][9][10][11]15]. Although the actual step which is dominant at a specific emission energy only influences the shape of the cross section relatively slightly, an appreciable contribution of higher steps affects the analyzing power distribution profoundly.…”
Section: B Analyzing Power Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although comparisons between experimental and theoretical analyzing power results suggest that this is not a serious concern, it would be advisable to investigate the lower-than-expected theoretical cross sections further. Based on the trend from comparable (p, 3 He) [8][9][10][11] and (p,α) [14,15] studies in the 100 MeV to 200 MeV incident-energy range, it is reasonable to speculate that the issue which is encountered in the magnitude of the predicted cross section is mainly related to problems with proton-induced multi-nucleon transfer reactions in general. For example, it is well known that severe momentum mismatch in (p,α) reactions to discrete final states makes it difficult, if not impossible, to extract spectroscopic information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another comparison, this time of the two reactions 59 Co(p, 3 Hex) [15] and nat Fe(n, 3 Hex) [13] are shown in figure 2. However, in this case not only are the targets and projectiles different, but the incident energy is 160 MeV for the proton-induced reaction and 175 MeV for the neutron projectile.…”
Section: Some General Features Of Pre-equilibrium Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%