1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00790-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusive muon capture in light nuclei

Abstract: We study total muon capture rates in light (A ∼ 6-18) nuclei, taking into account renormalizations of the nuclear vector and axial vector strengths. We estimate the influence in the results of uncertainties of the spin-isospin interaction parameter g ′ and nuclear densities. A few of these reactions are theoretical benchmarks for physics involving searches for neutrino oscillations. New experiments in muon capture in several targets are suggested, in the light of some discrepancies with theory, crudeness of so… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] gives (13.5−15.2)•10 −40 cm 2 ) and all inclusive and exclusive processes can be simultaneously and consistently described. We also mention that Singh et al [32] have studied the various processes based on the local density approximation and find a total (exclusive + inclusive) muon capture rate of (3.6 ± 0.22) • 10 4 s −1 [33] (the experimental value for the total rate is (3.8 ± 0.10) • 10 4 s −1 ) and a 12 C(ν µ , µ − ) 12 N cross section of (16.5 ± 1.3)10 −40 cm 2 [32], slightly lower, but consistent with our new result. Notably, Mintz and collaborators predicted the 12 C(ν µ , µ − ) 12 N cross section [34], but the model assumptions within the elementary particle model used in the approach of these authors are questionable and not justified for this reaction [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[11] gives (13.5−15.2)•10 −40 cm 2 ) and all inclusive and exclusive processes can be simultaneously and consistently described. We also mention that Singh et al [32] have studied the various processes based on the local density approximation and find a total (exclusive + inclusive) muon capture rate of (3.6 ± 0.22) • 10 4 s −1 [33] (the experimental value for the total rate is (3.8 ± 0.10) • 10 4 s −1 ) and a 12 C(ν µ , µ − ) 12 N cross section of (16.5 ± 1.3)10 −40 cm 2 [32], slightly lower, but consistent with our new result. Notably, Mintz and collaborators predicted the 12 C(ν µ , µ − ) 12 N cross section [34], but the model assumptions within the elementary particle model used in the approach of these authors are questionable and not justified for this reaction [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The quantity µ e −iqx stands for the leptonic matrix element written in coordinate space with q being the 3momentum transfer. The magnitude of − → q is defined from the kinematics of the process and is approximately given by [57] q…”
Section: Formalism Of Muon Capture Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation for this investigation comes from the results of a recent publication [1,2], where we have developed a model which describes rather well the inclusive 12 C(ν µ , µ − ) and 12 C(ν e , e − ) cross sections near threshold, and inclusive muon capture by nuclei. This approach, which is an extension of the quasi-elastic inclusive electron scattering model of [3], is based on a Local Fermi Gas (LFG), where the simplicity of the model makes it possible to include a great variety of effects into the reaction dynamics [4,5,6,7,8]. In particular long-range nuclear correlations are taken into account by computing the RPA polarization propagator containing nucleonic and ∆(1232) degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%