2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0249-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income and Beyond: Multidimensional Poverty in Six Latin American Countries

Abstract: This paper presents empirical results of a wide range of multidimensional poverty measures for: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, El Salvador, Mexico and Uruguay, for the period 1992-2006. Six dimensions are analysed: income, child attendance at school, education of the household head, sanitation, water and shelter. Over the study period, El Salvador, Brazil, Mexico and Chile experienced significant reductions of multidimensional poverty. In contrast, in urban Uruguay there was a small reduction in multidimensional po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
76
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the poverty indicators estimated using the proposed relative thresholds are close to those obtained for some normative lines used in several studies (Battiston et al 2013 This means that the levels and variations of poverty indicators between the two years considered are different from those obtained using fixed thresholds. Furthermore, this relative cutoff has full meaning because it allows those people who deviate from the standard behaviour of the population to be identifyied as poor.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Nevertheless, the poverty indicators estimated using the proposed relative thresholds are close to those obtained for some normative lines used in several studies (Battiston et al 2013 This means that the levels and variations of poverty indicators between the two years considered are different from those obtained using fixed thresholds. Furthermore, this relative cutoff has full meaning because it allows those people who deviate from the standard behaviour of the population to be identifyied as poor.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Ringen (1988) advocated for the use of both income and deprivation. Various authors have emphasized that the combination monetary and non-monetary components would be able to improve the measurement and understanding of poverty (Betti & Verma, 2004;Nolan & Whelan, 2009;Battiston et al, 2013;Bruck & Kebede, 2013;Yu, 2013;Siani, 2015;Krishnan, 2015;Angulo, Diaz & Pardo, 2016;Kaptan, 2016;Martinez-Martinez et al, 2016). Local literature that also uses a hybrid measure includes Klasen, 2000;Noble, Barnes, Wright & Roberts, 2010;Statistics South Africa, 2014b).…”
Section: Poverty Measurement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monetary indicators are considered much more likely to fluctuate in the short term than non-monetary indicators are (Clark and Hulme, 2005;Hulme and Shepherd, 2003) as an increase in monetary resources and may not immediately translate into improvements in non-monetary outcomes (or vice versa). Some consider monetary poverty measures a reflection of a short-term condition, while multidimensional poverty indicators might be more representative of a permanent situation (Ayala et al, 2011) or structural condition of poverty (Battiston et al, 2013).…”
Section: Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%