2012
DOI: 10.5089/9781463930578.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income Inequality and Current Account Imbalances

Abstract: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the IMF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the variables of current account balance, primary balance, and interest rate were included in Equation (7) to control for foreign demand, fiscal policy, and monetary factors (Martin & Philippon, 2014;Ranciere, Throckmorton, Kumhof, Lebarz, & Richter, 2012). However, the results were insignificant, and also, the significance of the remaining variables was affected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the variables of current account balance, primary balance, and interest rate were included in Equation (7) to control for foreign demand, fiscal policy, and monetary factors (Martin & Philippon, 2014;Ranciere, Throckmorton, Kumhof, Lebarz, & Richter, 2012). However, the results were insignificant, and also, the significance of the remaining variables was affected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature on this subject is vast and has yielded numerous conflicting results, as some authors discovered the Fisher hypothesis, which argues that the main drivers of fragility are the private sector's explosive degree of indebtedness, resulting in the destabilization of financial markets, thus causing harm to the economy overall (Bazillier and Hericourt, 2017;Destek and Koksel, 2019), while others found the Minsky hypothesis, which posits that a period of extreme euphoria and growth was followed by financial downfalls as a result of inefficient investment decisions and speculative activities (Kumhof and Ranci ere, 2010;Fasianos et al, 2017;Bodea et al, 2021). Others discovered the Rajan hypothesis, which posits that a significant increase in inequality was the major driver of the crisis (Kumhof et al, 2012;Stiglitz, 2012;Perugini et al, 2013Perugini et al, , 2016El-Shagi et al, 2019). Among these studies, others find the relationship to be inconclusive (Tridico, 2012).…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of government intervention, especially in equitable distribution, efficient production and economic stabilization for achieving well-being, is essential and cannot be overemphasized. In recent years, there has been discussion in the literature to examine the potential role of government in the equitable distribution, production and stabilization essentially in an environment characterized by macroeconomic imbalance (Rajan, 2010;Ranciere et al, 2012;Pettis, 2013;Frank et al, 2014;Bertrand and Morse, 2016;Piketty et al, 2018). Also, studies have examined the importance of institution of government in achieving any of the welfare objectives with findings suggesting that the performance of government institution determines the development of an economy (Kim et al, 2018;Hall and Ahmad, 2012;Slesman et al, 2015;Acemoglu and Robinson, 2008).…”
Section: Drivers Of Unemployment Intensity In Ssamentioning
confidence: 99%