2000
DOI: 10.1506/qxbv-uy71-a6w1-fwt4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income Smoothing and Discretionary R&D Expenditures of Japanese Firms*

Abstract: During the recent recession (1991 to present), Japanese firms decreased their spending on R&D for the first time since World War II. The decreases have raised concerns that Japanese managers may be making suboptimal allocations to R&D. We test whether Japanese managers adjust R&D based on short‐term performance. Our results show that Japanese firms in several industries adjust their R&D budgets to smooth profits. Interestingly, adjustments to R&D are larger in expansion years. These results, similar to those d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Degeorge et al(1999) identify three earnings threshold that drive earnings management: reporting profits, performance relative to the prior comparable period and performance relative to analysts' earnings projections. Some studies focus on the reduction of investment in R&D in order to smoothen the results around the average analysts forecast (Graham et al, 2005;Perry and Grinaker, 1994;Bange and De Bondt, 1998;Mande et al, 2000). However, some authors document that R&D creates a serious timing problem because most of the annual R&D spent is likely to have occurred before analysts' forecasts (Osma, 2008;Osma and Young, 2009;Dumas, 2012).…”
Section: Randd Expenditures and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, Degeorge et al(1999) identify three earnings threshold that drive earnings management: reporting profits, performance relative to the prior comparable period and performance relative to analysts' earnings projections. Some studies focus on the reduction of investment in R&D in order to smoothen the results around the average analysts forecast (Graham et al, 2005;Perry and Grinaker, 1994;Bange and De Bondt, 1998;Mande et al, 2000). However, some authors document that R&D creates a serious timing problem because most of the annual R&D spent is likely to have occurred before analysts' forecasts (Osma, 2008;Osma and Young, 2009;Dumas, 2012).…”
Section: Randd Expenditures and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roychowdhury (2006) Beyond the U.S context, Mande et al (2000) show that in the Japanese context managers adjust R&D investments to smoothen profits. Tokuga and Tanaka (2011) In the French context, the only study about myopic R&D investment is conducted by Dumas (2012) over the period 2001-2010.…”
Section: Randd Expenditures and Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the stereotypical image of a Japanese manager in mind, one might expect there to be no link between R&D spending and achieving earnings targets. However, Mande, File andKwak 2000 (2000, pp. 288-89) found that Japanese firms, at least in several industries, do in fact adjust R&D spending according to current period earnings performance.…”
Section: The Literature and The Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another case is when institutions that have high portfolio turnover and engage in momentum trading they increase the probability that managers reduce R & D to reverse an earnings decline. Mande et al (2000) argued that Japanese managers may be making suboptimal allocations to R & D spending due to the recent recession period and they tested whether Japanese managers adjust R & D spending based on the firm's performance in the short-term by smoothing earnings. Chan et al(2007) using a sample period from 1991 to 2002 tested many hypotheses that turn around the differential long-term market impact of either the expense method or the capitalization method may cause and, thus far, how value-relevant is each one of these two options.…”
Section: Research In Applied Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%