1995
DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(95)00098-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income tax compliance in India: An empirical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major studies of tax evasion undertaken in developing countries show that it is not uncommon for 50% or more of potential income tax to remain uncollected due to tax evasion (Bird, 1992;Gillis, 1989;Richupan, 1984). Das-Gupta, Lahiri, and Mookherjee (1995) observe that in India, the amount of income not subject to taxation is estimated to be more than 200% of the assessed income. EDEV is measured in this study based on the natural log of GDP per capita, which is collected from the 2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2005a).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Major studies of tax evasion undertaken in developing countries show that it is not uncommon for 50% or more of potential income tax to remain uncollected due to tax evasion (Bird, 1992;Gillis, 1989;Richupan, 1984). Das-Gupta, Lahiri, and Mookherjee (1995) observe that in India, the amount of income not subject to taxation is estimated to be more than 200% of the assessed income. EDEV is measured in this study based on the natural log of GDP per capita, which is collected from the 2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2005a).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, only a few papers have focused on tax evasion in Asia (see, for example, DasGupta, Lahiri and Mookherjee, 1995;Wong, 2001;Manasan, 2000). Thus, new empirical evidence helps reduce these shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is widely shown that in India, the tax rate is the prime cause of tax evasion and black income generation. 1950/1951-1978/19797-9 Chopra (1982) Sectoral analysis and wage 1970/1971-1976/19775-10 Gupta and Gupta (1982 Currency model 1967-1978 9.5-48 Gupta and Mehta (1981) Physical input approach 1964approach /1965approach -1978approach /1979approach 3-20 NIPFP (1985 Monetary and survey approach 1975/1976-1983/1984 18-21 For instance, Das- Gupta et al (1995) showed that both revenues collected and compliance were significantly affected by tax structure (marginal tax rates and exemption limit). This is the reason why we mainly focus on tax rates as factors of black economy generation.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%