2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/8729367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incoming Work-In-Progress Prediction in Semiconductor Fabrication Foundry Using Long Short-Term Memory

Abstract: Preventive maintenance activities require a tool to be offline for long hour in order to perform the prescribed maintenance activities. Although preventive maintenance is crucial to ensure operational reliability and efficiency of the tool, long hour of preventive maintenance activities increases the cycle time of the semiconductor fabrication foundry (Fab). Therefore, this activity is usually performed when the incoming Work-in-Progress to the equipment is forecasted to be low. The current statistical forecas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning methods have been used before for analysis and decision making in semiconductor fabs. Some examples are work-in-progress prediction [13], lead time prediction [14], dynamic storage dispatching [15], vehicle traffic control [16], and wafer defect detection using image classification [17,18]. The machine learning method is classified as a data-driven approach that is suitable for cases with complicated relationships between many factors [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods have been used before for analysis and decision making in semiconductor fabs. Some examples are work-in-progress prediction [13], lead time prediction [14], dynamic storage dispatching [15], vehicle traffic control [16], and wafer defect detection using image classification [17,18]. The machine learning method is classified as a data-driven approach that is suitable for cases with complicated relationships between many factors [19].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%