2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomparable compactifications of the ray with Peano continuum as remainder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 , and the claim follows since the mapπ 2 R ⊆ ∩K(X) 2 is closed by Lemma 4.12. If F is analytic, then H is analytic since K(X) is Polish and R ⊆ is closed in K(X)2 by Observation 4.11. The claim follows since the map π 2 is continuous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 , and the claim follows since the mapπ 2 R ⊆ ∩K(X) 2 is closed by Lemma 4.12. If F is analytic, then H is analytic since K(X) is Polish and R ⊆ is closed in K(X)2 by Observation 4.11. The claim follows since the map π 2 is continuous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Original motivation comes from our interest in spirals [2] and from the construction of Minc [12], who for each nondegenerate metric continuum X constructed a metrizable compactum K whose components form a pairwise non-homeomorphic family of spirals over X with the decomposition space being 2 ω , and asked [12,Question 1] whether there is a metrizable compactum K whose set of components is equivalent to the class of all spirals over X, i.e. whether the class of all spirals over X is compactifiable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%