1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1978.tb00008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incompetence of the Cervix

Abstract: The author reviews a personal series of 248 cases of incompetence of the uterine cervix. Careful selection of patients and variation of the operative techniques to suit the abnormality have led to a substantial improvement in the success rate. In the past 10 years, 94% of patients have been delivered of living babies. The history of the condition is briefly described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pregnancy complicated by painless dilatation and shortening of the cervix during the second trimester has been treated for many years by cervical cerclage (Shirodkar 1955 ;McDonald 1957McDonald , 1980. In addition, some obstetricians consider that improved fetal survival can be achieved by inserting a suture electively before cervical weakness becomes demonstrable (Kuhn & Pepperell 1977;McDonald 1978McDonald , 1980Harger 1980). So far, no experimentally derived evidence is available to justify such practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnancy complicated by painless dilatation and shortening of the cervix during the second trimester has been treated for many years by cervical cerclage (Shirodkar 1955 ;McDonald 1957McDonald , 1980. In addition, some obstetricians consider that improved fetal survival can be achieved by inserting a suture electively before cervical weakness becomes demonstrable (Kuhn & Pepperell 1977;McDonald 1978McDonald , 1980Harger 1980). So far, no experimentally derived evidence is available to justify such practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might suspect that not all the 332 index pregnancies had true cervical incompetence, or that a proportion had had a suture inserted in previous pregnancies. The time at which the suture was inserted varied widely and although similar to other retrospective series (Seppala & Vara 1970;Laurensen & Fuchs 1973;Kuhn & Pcpperell 1977) it was often outside the generally recommended gestation of 12-16 (Robboy 1973;McDonald 1978) or 14-18 weeks (Kuhn & Pepperell 1977). In the latter studies it was conceded that signs of dilation or shortening of the cervix during pregnancy sometimes made a late insertion of suture necessary (Robboy 1973;Kuhn & Pepperell 1977;McDonald 1978), but in this series only 35% of cases had an insertion of suture between 12 and 16 weeks, and 24% between 14 and 13 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The time at which the suture was inserted varied widely and although similar to other retrospective series (Seppala & Vara 1970;Laurensen & Fuchs 1973;Kuhn & Pcpperell 1977) it was often outside the generally recommended gestation of 12-16 (Robboy 1973;McDonald 1978) or 14-18 weeks (Kuhn & Pepperell 1977). In the latter studies it was conceded that signs of dilation or shortening of the cervix during pregnancy sometimes made a late insertion of suture necessary (Robboy 1973;Kuhn & Pepperell 1977;McDonald 1978), but in this series only 35% of cases had an insertion of suture between 12 and 16 weeks, and 24% between 14 and 13 weeks. It is somewhat surprising that the timing of insertion of the suture did not appear to influence significanlly the risk of pregnancy ending prematurely, expcricnce which is at variance with Lhe series described by Kuhn & Pepperell (1 977) where cervical suture between 14 and 18 weeks led to a lower premature delivery rate than later suture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Согласно классическому определению для ист-мико-цервикальной недостаточности харак-терно размягчение, расширение и укорочение шейки матки до 37-й недели беременности при отсутствии угрозы прерывания. ИЦН обычно проявляется с безболезненной, прогрессив-ной дилатации шейки матки во II или в начале III триместра, которое приводит к пролапсу, инфицированию и преждевременному разрыву плодных оболочек, прерыванию беременности или преждевременным родам [1][2][3][4][5]. Этот диа-гноз традиционно ставится пациентам с исто-рией повторных самопроизвольных абортов во II триместре и/или ранних преждевремен-ных родов, у которых основной механизм за-ключается в «неспособности шейки матки оставаться закрытой» [6].…”
unclassified