2018
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2017.2786255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete CSI Based Resource Optimization in SWIPT Enabled Heterogeneous Networks: A Non-Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is attributed to its potential capability of effectively transmitting information and power at the same time if the trade-off between information decoding and energy harvesting can be cleverly overcome. Some prior works on SWIPT in large-scale wireless networks (typically see [18]- [23]) had already studied the popular performance metrics, such as coverage/outage probability, downlink rate, average received energy and energy efficiency. For instance, reference [18] analyzed the outage probability performance and the averaged harvested energy for a power-splitting receiver in a wireless ad hoc network using non-cooperative and cooperative relaying protocols, whereas it did not study how transmission scheduling and relay selection impact the outage and energy-harvesting performances.…”
Section: A Prior Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed to its potential capability of effectively transmitting information and power at the same time if the trade-off between information decoding and energy harvesting can be cleverly overcome. Some prior works on SWIPT in large-scale wireless networks (typically see [18]- [23]) had already studied the popular performance metrics, such as coverage/outage probability, downlink rate, average received energy and energy efficiency. For instance, reference [18] analyzed the outage probability performance and the averaged harvested energy for a power-splitting receiver in a wireless ad hoc network using non-cooperative and cooperative relaying protocols, whereas it did not study how transmission scheduling and relay selection impact the outage and energy-harvesting performances.…”
Section: A Prior Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the sufficient conventional electricity generation, the power distribution problem of the retailers that generate RESs is not considered to cognitive small BSs. On the other hand, the authors of [21] proposed a non-cooperation game based power allocation mechanism for energy harvesting enabled small BSs. Nevertheless, these small BSs connecting to the power grid are considered.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, dense deployment increases interference power from all the other SBSs because of aggressive frequency reuse, which deteriorates the quality of service of mobile users . Therefore, interference evaluation is even more challenging in UDNs and heterogeneous UDNs (HUDNs) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Therefore, interference evaluation is even more challenging in UDNs and heterogeneous UDNs (HUDNs). 7,8 In wireless networks, the statistic of signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) depends strongly on the geographical locations of the base stations (BSs), and these locations are usually unknown in standard design or even in a realistic network. [9][10][11][12] The appropriate network deployment model is needed to deal with the network interference problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%