2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-006-0066-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete oblique projections for solving large inconsistent linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the oblique projections used by Arioli et al [1], Scolnik et al [30], Censor and Elfving [7] and Censor et al [9] and the projection mapping associated with the 1-norm, +∞-norm and p-norm onto a hyperplane used by Mangasarian [19,20]. For applications using gauge distances; that is, distances associated with gauge functions (see Remark 6), as well as distances associated with different norms see [6,27].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the oblique projections used by Arioli et al [1], Scolnik et al [30], Censor and Elfving [7] and Censor et al [9] and the projection mapping associated with the 1-norm, +∞-norm and p-norm onto a hyperplane used by Mangasarian [19,20]. For applications using gauge distances; that is, distances associated with gauge functions (see Remark 6), as well as distances associated with different norms see [6,27].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This view point allows the study of the notion of projection in several different contexts. Works dealing with projections associated to different distances include Carrizosa and Plastria [6], Censor and Elfving [7], Censor et al [9], Mangasarian [19,20], Dax [11,12], Plastria and Carrizosa [27] and Scolnik et al [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of this paper is to apply a convex regularizing function for improving the performance of the incomplete oblique projections (IOP) method, introduced in Scolnik et al (2008b) by the authors for solving linear least squares problems, when applied to image reconstruction problems. That method uses a scheme of IOP onto the solution set of the augmented system Ax − r = b , and converges to a weighted least squares solution of the system Ax = b when rank ( A )= n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve , we have defined two convex sets in the (2 n + m )‐dimensional space , denoted by [ u ; v ] the vertical concatenation of , with , and for all , D is a diagonal matrix of order 2 n + m , whose n first elements are 1's, the next m coincide with those of D m , and the last n elements are those of D n . By means of a direct application of the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions (Luenberger, 1986) to the problem it is possible to prove (see Scolnik et al, 2008b) that this is equivalent to . That observation led us to use the IOP algorithm for solving , applying projections scheme between the sets and , as in the original development in Scolnik et al (2008b), replacing the computation of the exact projections onto by suitable incomplete or approximate projections (Scolnik et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%