2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete uptake of EGFR mutation testing and its impact on estimation of mutation prevalence in patients with non-squamous NSCLC: A population-based study in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our earlier work showed that EGFR mutation testing increased from 3.7% of all patients in 2010 to 64.6% in 2014 in this population-based retrospective cohort [20]. In parallel, recorded EGFR mutation rates decreased from 43.8% in 2010 to 16.8% in 2014, reflecting decreases in selective testing [22]. Taking into account this variation, we assessed the external validity of the model in the independent earlier period dataset, and the results were similar to those in the development group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our earlier work showed that EGFR mutation testing increased from 3.7% of all patients in 2010 to 64.6% in 2014 in this population-based retrospective cohort [20]. In parallel, recorded EGFR mutation rates decreased from 43.8% in 2010 to 16.8% in 2014, reflecting decreases in selective testing [22]. Taking into account this variation, we assessed the external validity of the model in the independent earlier period dataset, and the results were similar to those in the development group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Māori and Pacific people have a higher incidence of lung cancer and poorer survival, compared to the New Zealand European population [49]. But, the testing rate was particularly low in Māori patients compared to other ethnic groups [22]. Our model may be helpful in addressing ethnic disparity in lung cancer patients in New Zealand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGFR mutation has been proven to be more common in female, Asian, non-smoker and adenocarcinoma lung cancer patients internationally 37−39 . In New Zealand, our previous study showed that EGFR mutation was more prevalent in female, in Asian and Paci ca compared to New Zealand European, and in non-smokers compared to current smokers 33,36 . Considering statistical signi cance of the factors and interactions between factors may be necessary for developing survival predictive models in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although our cohort included a considerably large number of patients (n = 1534), the EGFR mutation was positive in 20% of patients (n = 310), which limits the power of subgroup analyses. The EGFR mutation information was based on the patient population tested for EGFR mutation where testing was incomplete -the testing rate was 65% among eligible non-squamous NSCLC based on the same region data in 2014, and attributable to patient selection bias 36 . We plan to assess the changes when testing becomes more complete in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was approved by the Northern Health and Disability Ethics committee (No: 13/NTB/165/AM02) and registered (ACTRN12615000998549). More details about the study design and setting are described elsewhere …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%