2018
DOI: 10.1002/hed.25156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incompletely treated malignancies of the major salivary gland: Toward evidence‐based care

Abstract: Failure to achieve gross total resection during initial surgery resulted in worse OS. Adequate preoperative planning is required for initial surgical management to optimize tumor control and survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study analyzed retrospectively their patients with incompletely treated major salivary gland tumors and found that failure to achieve gross total resection during initial surgery resulted in worse overall survival. 11 Moreover, gross residual disease was an independent predictor in these cases. Similarly, multivariate analyses of both LRC and DDFS showed that gross residual disease was an important risk factor in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A previous study analyzed retrospectively their patients with incompletely treated major salivary gland tumors and found that failure to achieve gross total resection during initial surgery resulted in worse overall survival. 11 Moreover, gross residual disease was an independent predictor in these cases. Similarly, multivariate analyses of both LRC and DDFS showed that gross residual disease was an important risk factor in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In that respect, in a recent large study including 440 patients with incompletely treated major salivary gland tumors, positive or close margins did not play any prognostic role for locoregional recurrence. 6 In fact, the prognostic role of surgical margins seems to be significant only in case of invaded margins. 10 Likewise, Mantsopoulos et al 11 analyzed 25 cases of revision parotidectomy after positive/close margins and found tumor residue in only 12% of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is little evidence in literature to guide therapeutic strategy. 2,5,6 For some authors, revision surgery must be systematic to prevent local recurrences and remove potential intraparotid metastases. 4 But this attitude leads to a higher risk of postoperative facial palsy (FP) (15%-40% definitive FP vs 1% for first-line excisions), 6 while related oncological results improvement is not precisely known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations