2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incompressible moving boundary flows with the finite volume particle method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method with particle shifting is called ISPH_DFS. The idea of shifting particle positions has been proposed previously in the context of the Finite Volume Particle Method (FVPM) by Nestor et al [22]. This allows the use of particle velocities with a correction, u 0 , added to conserve fluid momentum.…”
Section: Isph Based On Combining Both a Divergence-free Velocity Fielmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method with particle shifting is called ISPH_DFS. The idea of shifting particle positions has been proposed previously in the context of the Finite Volume Particle Method (FVPM) by Nestor et al [22]. This allows the use of particle velocities with a correction, u 0 , added to conserve fluid momentum.…”
Section: Isph Based On Combining Both a Divergence-free Velocity Fielmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(34). Similar to the velocity correction equation, u 0 , in [22], but modifying the particle shifting magnitude, a, in relation to the particle convection distance and the particle size, the position shift reads…”
Section: Isph Based On Combining Both a Divergence-free Velocity Fielmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aiming to minimize this problem, Monaghan [29] proposed the so-called XSPH variant, which modifies the particle movement based on the local average velocity to attain a more isotropic particle distribution. On the other hand, the 'particle shifting' algorithm, developed by Xu et al [5] based on the earlier work of Nestor et al [14], has proved to be more effective and robust. On the other hand, the 'particle shifting' algorithm, developed by Xu et al [5] based on the earlier work of Nestor et al [14], has proved to be more effective and robust.…”
Section: Modified Particle Shifting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, a projection method is typically used to solve the pressure in the field, which also increases the accuracy of the calculation for this field variable [4,10]. In this context, special emphasis must be given to 'particle shifting' [5], a tool designed to improve the robustness and accuracy of the ISPH formulation, based on a particle correction methodology previously introduced for the finite volume (FV) particle method [14]. Recently, various researchers dedicated their efforts to improve the accuracy of SPH for both algorithms, for example [5][6][7][11][12][13] among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%