Inconsistency in 9mm bullets: Correlation of jacket thickness to post-impact geometry measured with non-destructive X-ray computed tomography

Abstract

Copyright and reuse:The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-forprofit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way."NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Forensic Science International. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Forensic Science International, Volume 234 (2014) DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.11.002" A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP url' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. AbstractFundamental to any ballistic armour standard is the reference projectile to be defeated. Typically, for certification purposes, a consistent and symmetrical bullet geometry is assumed, however variations in bullet jacket dimensions can have far reaching consequences. Traditionally, characteristics and internal dimensions have been analysed by physically sectioning bullets -an approach which is of restricted scope and which precludes subsequent ballistic assessment. The use of a non-destructive X-ray computed tomography (CT) method has been demonstrated and validated (Kumar et al., 2011 [15]); the authors now apply this technique to correlate bullet impact response with jacket thickness variations. A set of 20 bullets (9 mm DM11) were selected for comparison and an image-based analysis method was employed to map jacket thickness and determine the centre of gravity of each specimen. Both intra-and inter-bullet variations were investigated, with thickness variations of the order of 200 μm commonly found along the length of all bullets and angular variations of up to 50 μm in some. The bullets were subsequently impacted against a rigid flat plate under controlled conditions (observed on a high-speed video camera) and the resulting deformed projectiles were re-analysed. The results of the experiments demonstrate a marked difference in ballistic performance between bullets from different man...

Is CT bulletproof? On the use of CT for characterization of bullets in forensic radiology

“…Studies using industrial CT scanners, with higher resolution (13 μm) and tube voltage (320 kVp), were able to distinguish between the jacket and core. They showed that the thickness of the jacket layer was ~ 0.3–0.4 mm, which is comparable to the size of only one pixel (0.35 mm) on our clinical CT images [11, 17]. Unfortunately, such industrial scanners are not widely available and are not suited for whole body applications [11].…”

The Outcome of the Forensic Triage Preceding Disaster Victim Identification in the Downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17

“…To avoid tissue radiation damage, the X-ray tube voltage in medical CT scanners is limited to 150 kVp. Industrial scanners may use energies up to 320 kVp [ 16 ], but these scanners require the body to be rotated, which makes them unsuitable for PMCT. Moreover, higher X-ray energies may also affect or hamper autopsy findings [ 15 ].…”

Determination of the Worst Case for the Ballistic Test of the Soft Armour System Using the 9mm FMJ Bullets Differing in the Structure

“…al [12] and Thornby et. al [13] indicated the variation of the ballistic behavior of bullets made by various manufacturers especially with respect to asymmetric thinning of the jacket in regions of pre-impact weakness. The bullets were analyzed via CT, subsequently impacted into a rigid flat plate, and the resulting bullet deformation was re-analyzed [12].…”