2012
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/8/085002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inconsistency in super-luminal CERN–OPERA neutrino speed with the observed SN1987A burst and neutrino mixing for any imaginary neutrino mass

Abstract: We tried to fit in any way the recent Opera-Cern claims of a neutrino super-luminal speed with observed Supernova SN1987A neutrino burst and all (or most) neutrino flavor oscillation. We considered three main frame-works: (1) A tachyon imaginary neutrino mass, whose timing is nevertheless in conflict with observed IMB-Kamiokande SN1987A burst by thousands of billion times longer. (2) An ad hoc anti-tachyon model whose timing shrinkage may accommodate SN1987A burst but greatly disagree with energy independent C… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Neutrino mixing.-It has been pointed out [83] that the observed oscillations between neutrinos of different flavors are strongly suppressed if the LIV parameters ð Þ and ð e Þ differ by more than Ám 2 1;2 =EðÞ 2 $ 10 À18 for EðÞ $ Oð10 MeVÞ and Ám 2 1;2 $ 10 À4 eV 2 . Assuming however an energy-independent common LIV, ð i Þ & 10 À10 seems quite consistent with all other data, in particular the supernova 1987 upper bound of $10 À8 on ð e Þ [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Neutrino mixing.-It has been pointed out [83] that the observed oscillations between neutrinos of different flavors are strongly suppressed if the LIV parameters ð Þ and ð e Þ differ by more than Ám 2 1;2 =EðÞ 2 $ 10 À18 for EðÞ $ Oð10 MeVÞ and Ám 2 1;2 $ 10 À4 eV 2 . Assuming however an energy-independent common LIV, ð i Þ & 10 À10 seems quite consistent with all other data, in particular the supernova 1987 upper bound of $10 À8 on ð e Þ [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the OPERA experiment reported an alleged evidence for superluminal muon neutrinos [14]. Although it was evident from the beginning that this experimental result contradicts all that we know about neutrinos and weak interactions [15][16][17][18], and hence was most probably due to some unaccounted systematic errors [19][20][21][22][23], it has generated a huge interest in our postmodern physics community. Many explanations of this unexpected and surprising result, one more fantastic than another, were proposed in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictably the results failed to be supported, and this was due to a reason that all readers of this journal understand: statistical uncertainty. See Fargion and D'Armiento (2012). The important part of this story is that data-analytical results in physics are always subject to replication with unambiguous confirmation or refutation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%