2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009jb006325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating and reporting uncertainties in fault slip rates

Abstract: [1] Quantitative slip rate estimates are essential to understanding crustal deformation processes and assessing seismic hazard. Computing slip rates requires two fundamental ingredients: estimates of the age of an offset landform or deposit and displacement along the fault of interest. Because both of these measures contain uncertainty, slip rates are inherently uncertain. Methods to compute and report slip rates have not been standardized, and therefore slip rate data are presented inconsistently and are freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
106
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown by McGill & Sieh (1991) and discussed by Zechar & Frankel (2009), dealing with a dense and imperfect (i.e. We assume that the offsets primarily result from repeated major coseismic fault slips, and therefore examine the broad range of offset values to recover the large coseismic slip increments that might have cumulated to build the various offsets.…”
Section: N T E R P R E Tat I O N a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by McGill & Sieh (1991) and discussed by Zechar & Frankel (2009), dealing with a dense and imperfect (i.e. We assume that the offsets primarily result from repeated major coseismic fault slips, and therefore examine the broad range of offset values to recover the large coseismic slip increments that might have cumulated to build the various offsets.…”
Section: N T E R P R E Tat I O N a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the piercing point is the standard deviation of all resulting random piercing points. The mean offset values of the two margins and the thalweg and finally, the slip rate of the SAMF, were calculated using the Zechar and Frankel (2009) functions.…”
Section: Slip Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the probabilistic approach of Zechar and Frankel (2009) to calculate rates of extension by combining our results from TCN dating and the two horizontal displacement (extension) distances calculated using dip angles of 40° and 60°. The results of these calculations are reported in Table 4 and extension rate PDFs on December 20, 2010 geosphere.gsapubs.org Downloaded from for each fan surface and the two dip angle scenarios are shown in Figure 15.…”
Section: Extension Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%