2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2913694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating Domain Knowledge into Natural Language Inference on Clinical Texts

Abstract: Making inference on clinical texts is a task which has not been fully studied. With the newly released, expert annotated MedNLI dataset, this task is being boosted. Compared with open domain data, clinical texts present unique linguistic phenomena, e.g., a large number of medical terms and abbreviations, different written forms for the same medical concept, which make inference much harder. Incorporating domain-specific knowledge is a way to eliminate this problem, in this paper, we assemble a new incorporatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges associated with word embedding is discussed by Liang et al [15] where prime filtering operation is carried out towards extracting the logical inference. Consideration of the medical dataset along with domain specific study is carried out by Lu et al [16]. The work of Ludwig et al [17] have presented a mechanism to extract specific action from a given textual contents using Bayesian network.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges associated with word embedding is discussed by Liang et al [15] where prime filtering operation is carried out towards extracting the logical inference. Consideration of the medical dataset along with domain specific study is carried out by Lu et al [16]. The work of Ludwig et al [17] have presented a mechanism to extract specific action from a given textual contents using Bayesian network.…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top of this sentence pair modeling scheme, previous studies have independently leveraged syntax (Chen et al, 2016), external knowledge Lu et al, 2019), ensemble methods (Ghaeini et al, 2018b), and language model fine-tuning (Alsentzer et al, 2019) to improve the performance of NLI systems. Nonetheless, to our knowledge, there have been no empirical results on the effect of combining these additions simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit integration of entity-level external knowledge has been used to improve many NLP models' performance (Das et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2018). Domain knowledge has also been demonstrated to be useful for in-domain tasks (Romanov and Shivade, 2018;Lu et al, 2019). Therefore, in addition to generic encoders such as MT-DNN and Tree-LSTM, we further enhance the model with domain-specific knowledge through indirectly leveraging labeled biomedical data for other tasks.…”
Section: Feature Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entity relation in EMRs mainly includes the relation between treatment and disease, treatment and symptom, test and disease, test and symptom, and disease and symptom. At present, the machine learning method is widely used in the field of medical texts [1][2][3][4], including the task of relation extraction of English EMRs [5], and most of the feature selections rely on English medical dictionaries and data sets [6] as well as syntactic analysis [7]. However, the relation extraction of Chinese EMRs is still scarce, which is reflected in two aspects: one is the relation between two specific entities and the other is neglecting the unique features of Chinese EMR texts and sentences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%