2018
DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-00003471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating genomic methods into contact networks to reveal new insights into animal behaviour and infectious disease dynamics

Abstract: Utilization of contact networks has provided opportunities for assessing the dynamic interplay between pathogen transmission and host behavior. Genomic techniques have, in their own right, provided new insight into complex questions in disease ecology, and the increasing accessibility of genomic approaches means more researchers may seek out these tools. The integration of network and genomic approaches provides opportunities to examine the interaction between behavior and pathogen transmission in new ways and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches have already incorporated landscape and other environmental features. In addition, the potential for inferring host contacts in network models using pathogen genetic markers (see below) has been acknowledged in recent reviews (Craft, ; Gilbertson, Fountain‐Jones, & Craft, ; White, Forester, & Craft, ), and some studies have directly compared host contact network parameters to parasite genotypes (Bull, Godfrey, & Gordon, ). Despite this, to our knowledge, no published studies have used network models to investigate pathogen movement within a landscape genetic framework.…”
Section: Common Methodological Approaches In Landscape Genetics and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches have already incorporated landscape and other environmental features. In addition, the potential for inferring host contacts in network models using pathogen genetic markers (see below) has been acknowledged in recent reviews (Craft, ; Gilbertson, Fountain‐Jones, & Craft, ; White, Forester, & Craft, ), and some studies have directly compared host contact network parameters to parasite genotypes (Bull, Godfrey, & Gordon, ). Despite this, to our knowledge, no published studies have used network models to investigate pathogen movement within a landscape genetic framework.…”
Section: Common Methodological Approaches In Landscape Genetics and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging field of phylodynamics coupled with parasite genomic data shows great potential for building upon and refining our understanding of parasite transmission in wildlife populations (see earlier section on ‘Spatial structure’). Additionally, incorporating social or contact data with parasite genomic data in a network analysis framework is an exciting open avenue for investigating disease dynamics (White et al 2017 ; Gilbertson et al 2018 ). For example, in a well-characterized European badger and cattle population, Crispell et al ( 2019 ) compared Mycobacterium bovis (causative agent for bovine tuberculosis) genomes from cattle and badgers to examine cross-species transmission and obtain fine-scale resolution of contact networks for bovine tuberculosis transmission.…”
Section: Fine Scale Transmission Dynamics: Contact Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such apathogenic agents should have rapid mutation rates to facilitate discernment of transmission relationships between individuals over time (31,32). Furthermore, these agents should be relatively common and well-sampled in a target population, have a well-characterized mode of transmission, and feature high strain alpha-diversity (local diversity) and high strain turnover (32,33). RNA viruses align well with these characteristics (34,35) such that apathogenic RNA viruses could act as "proxies" of specific modes of transmission (i.e., direct transmission) and indicate which drivers underlie transmission processes (36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%