2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating inter-relationships between different levels of genomic data into cancer clinical outcome prediction

Abstract: In order to improve our understanding of cancer and develop multi-layered theoretical models for the underlying mechanism, it is essential to have enhanced understanding of the interactions between multiple levels of genomic data that contribute to tumor formation and progression. Although there exist recent approaches such as a graph-based framework that integrates multi-omics data including copy number alteration, methylation, gene expression, and miRNA data for cancer clinical outcome prediction, most of pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the common approaches is that patients can be divided into two groups, such as high-risk survival and low-risk survival group, according to a survival-time threshold, and then a binary classification algorithm can be applied to predict the survival group for each individual patient in a test dataset [24, 26, 27, 52, 57]. This approach has an advantage of providing natural performance metrics from two by two contingency tables, along with positive and negative predictive values, to enable unambiguous assessments for survival prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the common approaches is that patients can be divided into two groups, such as high-risk survival and low-risk survival group, according to a survival-time threshold, and then a binary classification algorithm can be applied to predict the survival group for each individual patient in a test dataset [24, 26, 27, 52, 57]. This approach has an advantage of providing natural performance metrics from two by two contingency tables, along with positive and negative predictive values, to enable unambiguous assessments for survival prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explosion of these unprecedented dataset has provided many opportunities to examine the complex genetic architecture of several cancers and improve the diagnosis, treatment, and ultimately prevention of cancer [21, 35, 45-47]. Despite these efforts, it is crucial to develop a novel data integration method to better predict cancer clinical outcome, further exploring a global view on the interactions within/between meta-dimensional genomic data [23, 24, 27, 28, 39, 44, 56]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further improvement of these profi les may be obtained through the explicit incorporation of interrelationships between various types of measurements such as microRNA-mRNA target, or gene methylation-microRNA (based on a common target gene). This was demonstrated for the prediction of short-term and long-term survival from serous cystadenocarcinoma TCGA data [ 83 ].…”
Section: Multi-omics Disease Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Because different types of omics data have been shown to complement each other [8], there is a growing interest in effective methods for integrative analyses of multi-omics data [911]. The resulting methods have been successfully used to predict the molecular abnormalities that impact both clinical outcomes and therapeutic targets [5, 10, 1216].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%