2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating label dependency into the binary relevance framework for multi-label classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach has been shown to be very competitive [10]. Despite its successes [29], however, BR has also been criticized for the label-independence assumption [5], [10], [11], [12], [15], [16], [21]; and it is also known to suffer from imbalanced class representation in the binary training sets. The latter issue was discussed at great length in [30] and [31].…”
Section: Problem Transformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach has been shown to be very competitive [10]. Despite its successes [29], however, BR has also been criticized for the label-independence assumption [5], [10], [11], [12], [15], [16], [21]; and it is also known to suffer from imbalanced class representation in the binary training sets. The latter issue was discussed at great length in [30] and [31].…”
Section: Problem Transformation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, they rely on extending the attribute vectors by information about the classes to which the given example has already been shown to belong [3], [10], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. In our opinion, though, most of these papers fail to pay adequate attention to two critical issues: error-propagation, and unnecessary relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The rationale is to avoid additional noise that is introduced from completely uncorrelated labels. BR+ is another approach similar to Meta-Stacking (Alvares-Cherman et al [1]) that uses not all the label information at the meta level, but excludes the label being predicted itself. Additionally, it updates the label information at the meta level in a manner that is similar to CC using different chains.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviour segmentation is based on a deep understanding of the customer's current behaviour data, which mainly research past and current consumer behaviour and mode through the enterprise database (Alvares-Cherman et al, 2012). The purpose is to predict the future behaviour of customers, and develop targeted strategies to meet customer needs by customer classification.…”
Section: Customer Behaviour Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%